PolicyBrief
H.R. 5929
119th CongressNov 7th 2025
Critical Minerals Supply Chain Resiliency Act
IN COMMITTEE

This Act streamlines federal permitting for Department of Defense actions supporting the domestic supply chain for critical minerals, unless the project sponsor opts out.

Garland "Andy" Barr
R

Garland "Andy" Barr

Representative

KY-6

LEGISLATION

Defense Bill Expedites Critical Mineral Mining Permits: Projects Get 'Fast-Track' Status for National Security

If you’ve ever had to wait for a government permit—maybe for a home renovation, a business license, or a new road—you know the process can feel like watching paint dry in slow motion. This new piece of legislation, the Critical Minerals Supply Chain Resiliency Act, is essentially a big red “fast-pass” button for certain mining and processing projects deemed essential for national defense.

What it does is take specific actions the Department of Defense (DoD) is taking to secure our domestic supply of critical minerals—things like lithium, cobalt, and rare earth elements used in everything from F-35 jets to your smartphone battery—and automatically treat them as “covered projects” under a law called the FAST Act. This designation means they get an expedited, streamlined federal permitting review, even if they don't meet all the normal requirements for that fast track. The goal is clear: get these essential materials out of the ground and into the supply chain faster, bypassing some of the usual bureaucratic hurdles. These actions cover everything from feasibility studies for new mines to upgrading existing facilities to improve output or environmental safety (SEC. 2).

The Need for Speed: Securing the Supply Chain

Why the rush? The U.S. relies heavily on foreign sources for many critical minerals, which is a major national security vulnerability. The DoD has been working under a 2022 Presidential Determination to fix this, and this bill provides the regulatory tools to accelerate those efforts. For companies in the mining and processing sector, this is a huge incentive. It means less time and money spent waiting for federal approvals on everything from building a new processing plant to cleaning up an old mine site to extract valuable by-products. The bill specifically supports upgrades aimed at improving environmental sustainability and worker safety, which is a welcome detail in a sector often criticized for its environmental footprint.

The Trade-Off: Less Oversight, More Speed

Here’s where the policy meets the pavement. When a project is treated as a “covered project,” it means the standard, often lengthy, environmental and regulatory reviews are significantly shortened. While this speeds up defense preparedness, it raises questions about the rigor of the review process for projects that could have major local impacts. If you live near a proposed mining site or a new processing facility, the standard time you might have to review and comment on environmental impact statements could be compressed or bypassed entirely. The bill essentially allows these projects to skip some of the usual requirements of the FAST Act, prioritizing speed over the standard, exhaustive review process (SEC. 2, Federal Permitting Treatment).

Another key provision is the Permitting Dashboard. All these fast-tracked projects must be included on this public dashboard, which is great for transparency—you can track the progress of these defense-related projects. However, the bill includes a curious out: the project sponsor (the company doing the work) can request that the action not be treated as a covered project, thereby avoiding the dashboard and the entire fast-track process (SEC. 2, Exception to Covered Project Status). This raises a flag: why would a sponsor opt out of a fast track unless they wanted to avoid the public scrutiny that comes with being on the dashboard? It’s an interesting loophole that could potentially allow sensitive or controversial projects to operate under the radar.

The Bottom Line for Busy Citizens

This legislation is a powerful tool aimed at solving a genuine national security problem: securing the materials needed for modern technology. If successful, it could stabilize prices and supplies for industries reliant on these minerals. The cost, however, might be borne by local communities and environmental agencies who will have less time and fewer procedural tools to review and potentially push back on large-scale industrial projects. The bill grants the Secretary of Defense broad authority, relying on the sweeping language of the Defense Production Act, which is a necessary tool for national defense but one that warrants close attention when it comes to local environmental and procedural rights.