This Act mandates the Secretary to establish a system for verifying the good-standing license status of applicants before issuing a unique health identifier.
Aaron Bean
Representative
FL-4
The Medical License Verification Act mandates the Secretary to establish an automated system for verifying the licensing status of applicants for a unique health identifier. This system must confirm that applicants are both licensed and in good standing with their respective State licensing boards before the identifier is issued. This ensures that only properly credentialed healthcare providers receive these identifiers.
If you’ve ever had to deal with bureaucracy, you know the drill: fill out a form, submit your credentials, and wait. But when it comes to healthcare providers, this process is about to get a serious digital upgrade, according to the Medical License Verification Act. This short bill focuses on one critical step: making sure that everyone who gets a unique health identifier (UHI)—essentially a digital ID used in federal health systems—is actually who they say they are.
The bill mandates that the Secretary of Health and Human Services must establish an automated system within 30 days of the bill becoming law. This system’s job is simple but crucial: before issuing a UHI to a healthcare provider, it must automatically verify two things with the relevant State licensing board: first, that the provider is currently licensed in that State, and second, that their license is in “good standing.” No UHI is issued until that check clears.
Think of the UHI as the key that lets a provider access or interact with federal health data systems, including Medicare and Medicaid. Right now, if someone is trying to game the system—maybe they let their license lapse, or worse, they’re committing fraud—they could potentially still apply for and receive this identifier. The Medical License Verification Act closes that door.
For patients and taxpayers, this is a clear win for integrity. It means that the people interacting with sensitive health information and billing federal programs are, at a minimum, verified as currently licensed professionals. This step significantly reduces the risk of fraudulent actors, which ultimately protects both the quality of care and the public purse. It’s a simple, common-sense security measure that should have been in place already.
While the goal is solid, the bill sets a brutal timeline for the federal agency: 30 days to establish and implement this automated verification system. If you’ve ever tried to launch a new software system at work, you know 30 days is barely enough time to choose the coffee machine for the project team, let alone build a secure, automated system that needs to interface with 50 different State licensing databases.
This tight deadline poses the biggest practical challenge. A rushed implementation could lead to glitches, potentially causing delays for legitimate providers trying to get their UHIs. If the system is buggy, a doctor, nurse, or therapist who is perfectly licensed might get flagged incorrectly, creating an unnecessary administrative headache and slowing down their ability to practice or bill. The implementing agency will have to move at lightning speed to ensure the system is both functional and secure from day one, without relying on bad or incomplete data from State sources.
For the average healthcare provider applying for a UHI, this change means one more administrative hurdle, though ideally, it should be a quick, automated one. If the system works as intended, the verification should happen instantly behind the scenes. If it doesn't, it could add frustrating delays to their onboarding process. However, most providers will likely agree that adding a layer of verification is necessary to keep the integrity of the profession high and keep bad actors out of the system. This bill is a focused, targeted effort to clean up the digital credentials process, making the entire health system marginally safer and more trustworthy.