PolicyBrief
H.R. 5867
119th CongressOct 28th 2025
Plant-Powered School Meals Pilot Act
IN COMMITTEE

This bill establishes a pilot grant program to fund schools offering 100% plant-based meal options and creates a separate pilot program to help cover the costs of providing nondairy beverage substitutes for students with written requests for dietary accommodations.

Nydia Velázquez
D

Nydia Velázquez

Representative

NY-7

LEGISLATION

Pilot Program Funds $10M for Plant-Based School Meals and $2M to Cover Nondairy Milk Costs

Here’s a breakdown of the Plant-Powered School Meals Pilot Act, a bill that seeks to shake up the school lunch line with more plant-based options and better accommodation for kids who can’t, or choose not to, drink regular milk.

This legislation tackles two major areas in the cafeteria. First, it establishes a three-year pilot grant program, allocating $10 million for Fiscal Year 2026, to help school districts offer 100 percent plant-based breakfast and lunch options. Second, it clarifies and expands the rules for substituting fluid milk with nutritionally equivalent nondairy beverages for students with special dietary needs, backing this up with a separate $2 million pilot program to help schools cover the cost of those substitutions.

The $10 Million Plant-Based Push

The core of the bill is a new grant program aimed at getting more plant-based meals—meaning no meat, poultry, fish, dairy, or eggs—onto school menus. School food authorities (SFAs) can apply for these grants, which last for three years, to fund a variety of activities. Think professional development training for cafeteria staff on how to cook these meals, technical assistance, and even compensating staff for the extra work involved.

Crucially, the bill prioritizes grants for schools that serve a high percentage of students eligible for free or reduced-price meals. This is a big deal because it directs resources toward the communities that often need the most support. It also encourages schools to use the funds to buy ingredients from specific groups: local farmers, certified organic farms, and what the bill calls “underserved producers” (like beginning, veteran, or socially disadvantaged farmers). This provision creates a direct link between the school cafeteria and local, sustainable agriculture, potentially opening up new markets for these producers.

Milk Substitution: Who Pays the Bill?

Section 3 of the bill focuses on making sure schools can accommodate students whose diets restrict them from drinking fluid milk. The legislation clarifies existing requirements, mandating that schools must provide nutritionally equivalent nondairy beverages for students with medical needs (like a disability) or other special dietary needs (like a severe intolerance). If a parent or guardian submits a written request, the school must also provide a substitute nondairy beverage that meets nutritional standards.

This is where the second grant program comes in. The bill authorizes $2 million for a separate three-year pilot to help SFAs cover the costs of these written-request substitutions. This is important because, outside of this pilot program, the bill states that SFAs are generally responsible for covering any substitution costs that exceed the standard federal reimbursement. For a school food authority already operating on thin margins, absorbing those extra costs for specialized products could be a burden. The pilot aims to offset that financial pressure, particularly for schools with high rates of lactose intolerance among their students.

The Fine Print and Real-World Impact

For the busy parent, this bill means more choices and better accommodation for their kids. If you have a child with a dairy allergy, a dietary restriction, or who simply prefers a plant-based diet, this legislation ensures the school is required to provide a proper, nutritionally sound alternative. For the cafeteria worker, it means paid training and potentially new recipes to learn. For the local farmer, it means a potential new customer base in the school district.

However, it’s worth noting the financial tightrope schools walk. While the $2 million pilot covers the cost of nondairy substitutes requested in writing, schools still have to pick up the tab for other mandated substitutions (like those for medical needs) if the costs run over the existing federal reimbursement. This is a common challenge in school nutrition programs, where good intentions sometimes create unfunded mandates. Overall, though, this act provides significant new funding to test out innovative, inclusive, and potentially healthier meal options for students across the country.