This act allows certain long-standing rural hospitals that previously held Critical Access Hospital (CAH) status before 2002 to retain that designation under Medicare, even if they no longer meet current location requirements, provided they were the sole hospital in their county when their status was revoked.
Doug LaMalfa
Representative
CA-1
The Rural Hospital Fairness Act allows certain long-standing hospitals to retain their Critical Access Hospital (CAH) status under Medicare, even if they no longer meet current location requirements. This provision primarily benefits facilities designated as CAHs before January 1, 2002, provided they remain certified and were the sole hospital in their county when their status was previously revoked. This ensures continued Medicare support for these essential rural facilities.
The Rural Hospital Fairness Act is a very targeted piece of legislation designed to throw a lifeline to a specific group of small, rural hospitals. What it does, in short, is create an exception within the Medicare program that allows certain facilities to keep their valuable Critical Access Hospital (CAH) status, even if they no longer meet the current requirements that dictate where a CAH can be located.
To understand why this matters, you need to know what a CAH is. It’s a designation created to keep essential healthcare services available in remote areas. CAHs get special Medicare reimbursement rates, which is often the only thing keeping them financially viable. Without that status, many small hospitals would close. The catch is that to be a CAH, you usually have to meet strict rules about how far you are from other hospitals.
This bill focuses on hospitals that were designated as CAHs before January 1, 2002. If one of these older facilities lost its CAH status because it failed the location test, this bill lets them get it back—or keep it—under a few very specific conditions. It’s like a grandfather clause, but only for the facilities that really need it.
To benefit from this Act, a rural hospital has to tick three boxes. First, it must have been a CAH before 2002. Second, it must still be certified as a CAH by the end of 2024. This means the facility is still operating and meeting all the other general safety and operational requirements. Third, and most importantly, when the hospital was notified it was losing its CAH status, it had to have been the only hospital, CAH, or rural emergency hospital in its entire county.
This last condition is key. It signals that this exception is aimed squarely at preserving the sole source of local care. For people living in these counties—the farmers, the small business owners, the families—this bill means their local hospital stays open and funded, ensuring they don't have to drive an hour or more for emergency care or basic services. It’s a direct move to stabilize healthcare access in very specific, isolated communities.
While the intent is clearly beneficial for rural patients, this bill does create a layer of complexity for Medicare administrators. Creating exceptions to location rules means more paperwork and oversight to ensure only the strictly defined facilities qualify. Furthermore, the requirement that the hospital must still be certified as a CAH by the end of 2024 is a hard deadline. If a hospital that meets the historical criteria misses that 2024 certification deadline for any reason, they lose the opportunity for this exception.
For other rural hospitals that don't meet the pre-2002 designation date or were not the sole hospital in their county, this bill offers no relief. They still have to play by the current, strict location rules. This highlights that the Rural Hospital Fairness Act is less about broad policy change and more about correcting a historical funding issue for a handful of long-standing, essential community anchors.