PolicyBrief
H.R. 5785
119th CongressOct 17th 2025
Voluntary Grazing Permit Retirement Act of 2025
IN COMMITTEE

This Act establishes a voluntary program allowing permit holders in 16 Western States to retire their federal grazing permits in exchange for permanently ending livestock grazing on those allotments.

Adam Smith
D

Adam Smith

Representative

WA-9

LEGISLATION

New Federal Program Caps Voluntary Grazing Permit Retirement at 100 Per Year Across 16 Western States

The new Voluntary Grazing Permit Retirement Act of 2025 creates a formal, capped program allowing ranchers in 16 Western States to permanently waive their federal grazing permits or leases. If a rancher holding a permit on federal land managed by the Department of Agriculture or Interior chooses to give it up, the government must accept the waiver on a first-come, first-served basis, immediately ending the permit. The main consequence is that the specific grazing allotment must be permanently closed to commercial livestock grazing, meaning no new permits can ever be issued for that land, establishing a firm boundary on future grazing use (SEC. 4).

The Permanent Exit Strategy

This bill formalizes a tool that has been used successfully in specific national parks and wilderness areas: paying a rancher to voluntarily exit the business of grazing on federal land. The goal is to settle long-standing land use conflicts by giving ranchers a clean, permanent exit option. For example, if a rancher in Nevada is tired of fighting regulatory battles and wants to move on, this program offers a clear path to permanently end their federal land obligations. The Secretaries of Agriculture and Interior are required to treat any lands already administratively retired the same way, ensuring they remain permanently closed to grazing (SEC. 4).

The Catch: Forfeiting Improvements and the Annual Cap

While the program is voluntary, it comes with a major financial caveat: forfeiture of assets. If a rancher waives their permit, they automatically give up all claim to range developments on that land, such as fences, corrals, or water structures—even if they paid for them (SEC. 5). This means a rancher must weigh the value of exiting the permit against the sunk cost of their infrastructure. However, the bill explicitly protects existing water rights, so the waiver only affects the physical structures, not the underlying right to water.

Another key limitation is the program’s scale. The Secretaries can only accept a total of 100 grazing permits nationally across all 16 Western States per fiscal year, with a maximum of 25 permits from any single state (SEC. 4). For a region covering millions of acres and thousands of permits, this annual cap means the program’s impact on resolving widespread conflicts will be slow and highly selective. It ensures that the reduction in grazing capacity is gradual, but it also means many ranchers who might want to participate could be waiting in line.

Protecting the Newly Retired Land

Once a permit is retired, the government has a new responsibility: making sure that land stays retired. The bill requires the Secretary to "reasonably protect" the retired grazing allotment from unauthorized livestock trespassing (SEC. 5). This is where the rubber meets the road for enforcement. For the rancher who just gave up their permit, this provision is crucial—it ensures their neighbors can’t just let their cattle wander onto the newly closed land. However, the term “reasonably protect” is vague. It will be up to the federal land managers to define what measures—like enhanced fencing or increased patrols—are necessary to stop unauthorized grazing, a process that could lead to inconsistent enforcement across different states and agencies.