PolicyBrief
H.R. 575
119th CongressJan 21st 2025
Increased TSP Access Act of 2025
IN COMMITTEE

The "Increased TSP Access Act of 2025" amends Section 1242 of the Food Security Act of 1985 to improve the delivery of technical assistance by ensuring timely, science-based support and streamlining the certification process for third-party providers, thereby expanding expertise and capacity in conservation efforts. It also directs the Secretary to establish fair payment amounts for these services and increase transparency regarding fund allocation and program effectiveness.

James Baird
R

James Baird

Representative

IN-4

LEGISLATION

Farming Conservation Gets a Boost: New Bill Lets Outside Experts Help, Starting Now

The Increased TSP Access Act of 2025 shakes up how farmers get help with conservation. Instead of relying solely on government assistance, this bill brings in certified, third-party experts to provide "timely, science-based, and site-specific practice design and implementation assistance" (SEC. 2). The goal? To make it easier and faster for farmers to get the support they need to implement conservation practices on their land.

Bringing in the Experts

This bill essentially expands the pool of qualified professionals who can help farmers with things like conservation planning, watershed management, and environmental engineering (SEC. 2). The Secretary of Agriculture is in charge of setting up a system to certify these third-party providers. This can happen through a process run directly by the Secretary, or through approved non-Federal entities or State agencies (SEC. 2). Think agricultural retailers, co-ops, professional societies, or even specific organizations with relevant expertise (SEC. 2).

For a farmer, this could mean getting faster access to specialized help. Imagine a farmer needing to design a complex water conservation system. Instead of waiting on a potentially backlogged government agency, they could work with a certified local expert, speeding up the whole process.

Fast-Track Certification and Potential Pitfalls

The bill pushes for speed. The Secretary has 180 days to establish a process for non-Federal entities to certify these third-party providers (SEC. 2). These entities have specific duties, including assessing qualifications, providing training, and keeping the Secretary updated on who's certified and who's not (SEC. 2). The Secretary also has to review certifications from non-Federal entities within just 10 business days and add approved providers to a public registry (SEC. 2).

There is even a "streamlined certification process" within 180 days for providers who already have relevant specialty certifications (SEC. 2). This emphasis on speed, while potentially beneficial for getting more experts in the field, does raise a flag. Could this rush lead to less rigorous vetting of providers? The bill mandates a review of certification requirements within one year (SEC. 2), but the initial fast-tracking could be a point of concern.

Money Matters and Oversight

The bill directs the Secretary to set "fair and reasonable" payment rates for these third-party services, comparable to what the government would provide, factoring in things like specialized equipment, travel, and training (SEC. 2). Payments from other Federal programs for technical assistance are excluded from cost-sharing and capped at 100% of the fair and reasonable amount (SEC. 2). Within a year, the Secretary must publicly release information on funds used for third-party providers, certification results, and how these efforts are contributing to conservation (SEC. 2). This transparency is a good step, but the real test will be in how effectively the Secretary monitors the quality of work done by these outside providers.

While the Increased TSP Access Act aims to boost conservation efforts by expanding access to expertise, the reliance on third-party providers introduces some uncertainty. The potential for quicker, more specialized assistance is real, but so is the need for careful oversight to ensure quality and prevent potential conflicts of interest.