This Act terminates child survivor benefits for individuals aged 18 and older if the deceased parent was receiving benefits, was over 67, and earned over \$125,000 in the relevant taxable year.
H. Griffith
Representative
VA-9
This Act amends Social Security rules regarding child survivor benefits. It establishes a new condition where children aged 18 or older will cease to qualify as full-time students, thereby stopping their benefits. This cutoff specifically applies only if the deceased parent was already receiving old-age or disability benefits, was over age 67, and earned more than \$125,000 in the relevant taxable year.
This new section of the Act is all about putting a means test on Social Security survivor benefits, specifically targeting older students who are currently receiving them. Here’s the deal: If you’re a student aged 18 or older and you’re collecting survivor benefits based on a deceased parent’s earnings record, you could be cut off, but only under a very specific set of conditions.
Under current law, children who are full-time students can often continue receiving survivor benefits until they turn 19. This bill, however, changes the definition of a “full-time student” for certain beneficiaries, effectively ending their eligibility. The cutoff only happens if the deceased parent—the one whose earnings established the benefit—meets three criteria: they were already receiving old-age or disability insurance benefits, they were 67 years old or older, and they earned more than $125,000 in that taxable year (Sec. 2).
Think of it this way: The government is saying that if the deceased parent was wealthy enough (over $125,000 annual income) and old enough (over 67), then their adult children who are still in school shouldn't need the survivor benefit anymore. This provision is highly specific, essentially creating a new, high-income threshold for benefit termination. This isn't a broad cut; it's a targeted reduction for families in a particular economic bracket.
The immediate impact is clear: older students (18+) who are relying on these checks to help pay for college, rent, or living expenses will lose that established income source. For a student who lost a parent but was still counting on this benefit—which can be substantial—the money disappears. The bill states that this change takes effect for any monthly benefit payment made immediately after the law is enacted, meaning there’s no phase-out period (Sec. 2). One day you get the check, the next day, if your parent met that $125,000 threshold, you don't.
This move puts the financial burden squarely on the student or the surviving guardian to fill that gap, potentially forcing them to take on more debt or drop out of school. While the bill aims to reduce spending by targeting beneficiaries whose deceased parents were higher earners, for the student beneficiary, the loss is the same as if the parent had earned less. This is a classic example of policy that looks good on paper for saving money but causes immediate, sharp pain for the individuals who were depending on the existing safety net.