PolicyBrief
H.R. 5694
119th CongressMay 14th 2026
Alaska’s Right to Ivory Sales and Tradition Act
AWAITING HOUSE

This bill protects the right of Alaska Natives to create, sell, and transport authentic handicrafts made from marine mammal parts across state lines.

Nicholas Begich
R

Nicholas Begich

Representative

AK

LEGISLATION

ARTIST Act Protects Alaska Native Ivory Sales and Blocks State Bans on Traditional Handicrafts

The Alaska’s Right to Ivory Sales and Tradition Act (ARTIST Act) updates the Marine Mammal Protection Act of 1972 to explicitly safeguard the rights of Alaska Natives to harvest marine mammals for subsistence and the creation of traditional handicrafts. By clarifying definitions and prohibiting individual states from banning the sale of these items, the bill aims to secure the economic and cultural future of coastal Alaska Native communities. It specifically protects the interstate commerce of items like walrus ivory carvings and whalebone art, provided they are made using traditional methods rather than mass-production tools like pantographs.

Carving Out a Future for Tradition

Under this bill, an "authentic Alaska Native article" must be produced by a coastal Alaska Native using natural materials and traditional methods like weaving, carving, or sewing. For a small business owner in Anchorage or a traditional carver in a remote village, this means their livelihood is protected from outside interference. The bill specifically stops other states from passing laws that would ban the possession or sale of these items. If you’re a collector in California or a gallery owner in New York, you can legally buy and sell these authentic pieces without worrying about state-level ivory bans that often fail to distinguish between illegal elephant ivory and legal, culturally significant Alaska Native materials.

Protecting the Source

While the bill opens doors for commerce, it keeps a hand on the conservation brake. If the Secretary of Commerce or Interior determines a species—like a specific walrus population—is "depleted," they can step in with restrictions on harvesting. However, the bill adds a layer of protection for Native communities: any new regulations or legal challenges must be backed by "substantial evidence," which now explicitly includes Indigenous knowledge. This means if a government agency tries to shut down harvesting, they have to account for the lived experience and historical data held by the people who actually live on the land, not just satellite data or outside models.

The Fine Print on Authenticity

To keep the market honest, the bill sets strict rules on what counts as "authentic." It bans the use of "mass-copying devices," ensuring that the market isn't flooded with cheap, machine-made knockoffs that devalue the work of actual artisans. While this protects the brand of Alaska Native art, it also puts the burden on the artist to prove their methods are traditional. For consumers, this provides a level of certainty, but for the artisans, it means staying clear of modern shortcuts to maintain their legal status. The bill also allows for the sale of edible portions of marine mammals within Alaska, ensuring that traditional food sources remain integrated into the local economy and culture.