This Act establishes new, specific Medicare payment rules for hospitals that specialize in long-term care for catastrophic injuries like spinal cord or acquired brain injuries, provided they meet strict operational and research criteria.
Barry Loudermilk
Representative
GA-11
The Catastrophic Specialty Hospital Act of 2025 establishes a new, separate Medicare payment system for hospitals specializing in complex, long-term care for catastrophic injuries like spinal cord or acquired brain injuries. To qualify, hospitals must meet strict criteria regarding patient focus, continuum of care, volume, out-of-state patient draw, and research commitment over a three-year period. This designation grants these specialized facilities an exemption from standard Medicare payment rules for three-year renewable terms.
The newly introduced Catastrophic Specialty Hospital Act of 2025 creates a significant exception within the Medicare payment system (specifically Section 1886(m) of the Social Security Act). Essentially, it carves out a special payment lane for a small, highly specialized group of facilities—those focusing on long-term care for severe spinal cord and acquired brain injuries. If enacted, these "catastrophic specialty hospitals" would no longer be subject to the standard Medicare payment rules that govern most long-term care hospitals, meaning they could receive higher, non-standardized payments.
This isn’t a loophole for just any hospital; the requirements to qualify are extremely precise and demanding. To earn this lucrative, three-year designation from the Secretary of Health and Human Services, a hospital must prove, over a three-year window, that at least 80% of all its patient discharges were related to either spinal cord or acquired brain injuries. Think of it as needing to be hyper-focused on these complex cases. Furthermore, they must demonstrate a full continuum of care—inpatient, outpatient, and wellness support—and show a serious commitment to neurorehabilitation research, like publishing papers or running fellowship programs.
Beyond the specialization, the bill sets up two major hurdles that will severely limit who can qualify. First, the hospital must handle high volumes: at least 175 discharges for spinal cord injuries and at least 175 discharges for acquired brain injuries every year for three years. Second, they must prove they are regional or national hubs, not just local facilities. At least 30% of their discharged inpatients must have traveled from outside the state where the hospital is located. If you are a patient with a catastrophic injury, this means your options for this highly specialized, long-term care are likely limited to a handful of national centers that can meet these volume and research demands.
When Medicare pays hospitals, it generally uses standardized formulas to keep costs predictable. By exempting these specialized hospitals from those caps, the bill aims to ensure these facilities—which deal with incredibly expensive, long-term conditions—remain financially viable. This is a huge win for the handful of hospitals that can meet the criteria, as it stabilizes their funding for complex care and research. However, this also means that the cost per patient for these specific services will likely be higher than what Medicare currently budgets. For the average taxpayer and Medicare beneficiary, this represents a potential increase in overall Medicare spending, diverting funds from the standard payment pool to support these highly specialized centers. It’s a classic trade-off: ensuring top-tier, complex care exists, but at a potentially higher cost to the system.
While the criteria are strict, there is a moderate level of administrative complexity and potential ambiguity. The Secretary of HHS has the final say in designating these hospitals based on three years of complex data, including counting patients based on what would have been classified under old Medicare payment codes. This reliance on historical, potentially superseded classification systems (MSLTCHDRG) could create interpretation issues and means the Secretary holds significant power over which hospitals get this crucial financial lifeline. For hospitals that just miss the mark—say, they treat 79% of the required patients or only hit 25% out-of-state residency—they are left out in the cold, still subject to the standard payment rules, which could put them at a financial disadvantage compared to the newly designated “catastrophic specialty hospitals.”