This bill amends the Elementary and Secondary Education Act to enhance support, data collection, and accountability measures for English learners and their families.
Adriano Espaillat
Representative
NY-13
This bill amends the Elementary and Secondary Education Act to enhance support and accountability for English learners. It mandates new data collection on teacher diversity and sets clearer goals for English learner academic achievement. The legislation also expands authorized uses of funds for grantees to include providing comprehensive support services and culturally competent professional development for educators.
This legislation updates the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) to boost support and accountability for English learners (ELs). It’s a policy package focused on making sure kids learning English aren’t just getting language instruction, but are also set up for long-term academic success. Key changes include expanding how federal funds can be used to help EL families and requiring states to start tracking the diversity of their teaching staff.
If you’ve ever worried about kids being pulled out of regular classes just because they’re learning English, this bill addresses that head-on. The updated goal for EL programs is clear: help all English learners, including immigrant students, meet the same high academic standards as everyone else (Section 3102(2)). Crucially, the bill mandates that states should try their best not to separate EL students from their peers and should not block access to dual language programs. The idea is to fully integrate these students into the school’s academic life, not sideline them.
Another major change is the follow-up requirement. Agencies receiving federal funds must now detail exactly how they plan to monitor students after they exit the EL program to ensure they continue to meet challenging state academic standards (Section 3113(b)(8)(C)). This closes a critical gap, making sure a student doesn't fall behind the moment they're officially deemed proficient.
This is where the rubber meets the road for parents. Grantees can now use federal funds for a much wider range of support services for English learners and their families. Agencies can now spend money to increase access to legal help, educational resources, financial aid, and social services (Section 3115(d)). The game-changer? These resources and services must be available in the families' native language. For a parent navigating complex school forms or immigration issues, having access to these services in their own language could be the difference between sinking and swimming.
Beyond direct family support, the bill also mandates that funds can be used for professional development for educators, administrators, and counselors. This training must be "culturally competent and responsive" (Section 3115(d)(7)(C)), aimed at giving school staff the tools to effectively support ELs and immigrant youth. This is a crucial investment, recognizing that supporting these students requires more than just language skills—it requires understanding their context.
For those who track equity in education, this bill delivers a big reporting change. States must now include statistics on the racial, ethnic, gender, and linguistic diversity of their elementary and secondary school teachers in their annual reports (Section 1111(h)(1)(C)). This requirement creates transparency around who is actually teaching our kids, a key component in addressing achievement gaps. If the teaching staff doesn't reflect the student body, we can't fix that problem unless we measure it first.
Furthermore, accountability reporting is getting more granular. When reporting on student performance, agencies must now break down the data not just by major groups, but also by specific subgroups—including English learners who also have a disability, their ethnicity, race, and native language (Section 3121(a)). This level of detail means that if, say, Spanish-speaking EL students with disabilities are struggling in a particular district, the data will clearly flag that specific issue, making it harder for those disparities to be masked by overall success rates.