PolicyBrief
H.R. 5531
119th CongressSep 19th 2025
Career and Technical Education Access Act
IN COMMITTEE

The Career and Technical Education Access Act establishes a federal grant program to help states build and expand career-focused high school programs aligned with local job needs, while also creating a new CTE Pell Grant for high school students pursuing relevant training and certifications.

Adam Smith
D

Adam Smith

Representative

WA-9

LEGISLATION

New CTE Access Act Funds High School Career Training, Launches 'CTE Pell Grant' for Students

If you’ve ever tried to hire a plumber, an electrician, or a specialized technician lately, you know the skills gap is real. The Career and Technical Education Access Act aims to tackle this head-on by creating a new federal grant program to help states build or expand high school programs that teach actual job skills. The core idea is to sync up what high schools are teaching with what local employers are actually hiring for—think manufacturing, healthcare, and construction, not just coding. States that want this money have to submit a detailed 5-year plan showing how they’ll partner with local businesses and community colleges, and they must conduct a formal workforce assessment every three years to prove their training is still relevant (SEC. 3).

The 'Skills-to-Jobs' Pipeline

This isn’t just about adding a shop class; it’s about creating a verifiable path from high school to a good job or continued education. The bill mandates that programs receiving grants must offer Career-Aligned Coursework that links academic standards with in-demand jobs and ends with a recognized postsecondary credential (SEC. 5). For a student, this means the welding certification or nursing assistant training they complete in high school isn't just a resume filler—it must automatically count toward college credit at participating junior or community colleges. This is huge for keeping costs down and accelerating a career. States can use the grant money for everything from building new Regional Career Centers to buying the latest tools and software for training, and even funding paid internships and apprenticeships (SEC. 3).

Crucially, the Act specifically pushes for the development of online and hybrid CTE programs. This is a big win for students in rural areas or those with limited transportation, who are often shut out of centralized, hands-on training facilities. The bill targets Opportunity Youth (young people aged 16-24 who aren't working or in school) to make sure these new pathways are accessible to those who need them most (SEC. 2).

Financial Aid for High Schoolers

Perhaps the most practical element for families is the creation of the CTE Pell Grant (SEC. 4). Modeled after the existing Federal Pell Grant, this new financial aid is specifically for public high school students who need help paying for tuition or costs associated with approved technical training. This means if a high school student wants to get an industry certification, enroll in a dual-enrollment technical program at a community college, or join a pre-apprenticeship program, they can apply for federal aid to cover the costs. This is a game-changer because it recognizes that job-ready credentials often come with a price tag, even before college, and provides direct support to students with financial need.

The Catch: State Cost-Sharing and Performance Reviews

While the federal money is welcome, states won't get a free ride. The grant requires a non-federal match of between 25% and 50% of the total project cost, depending on the state’s proposal (SEC. 3). For states already struggling with education budgets, finding that matching money could be a hurdle. Also, states that receive funding will be under constant scrutiny. They must meet specific performance benchmarks related to student enrollment, graduation rates, job placement, and credentials earned. If a state misses these benchmarks for two years in a row, they have to submit a detailed corrective action plan. Fail to fix it, and the Secretary of Education has the power to reduce or cut off the grant money entirely (SEC. 3). This is a high-stakes system designed to ensure the funds actually translate into job-ready graduates, but it puts significant pressure on state education agencies to deliver measurable results quickly.