This bill establishes a centralized online portal managed by the Appraisal Subcommittee for appraiser credentialing, AMC registration, fee collection, and streamlined FBI background checks, while preserving state licensing authority.
Barry Loudermilk
Representative
GA-11
The Portal for Appraisal Licensing Act of 2025 establishes a centralized, cloud-based system managed by the Appraisal Subcommittee for appraiser credentialing and AMC registration. This portal will streamline license submissions, fee payments, and access to required FBI background checks for state regulators. While the system centralizes data and tracking via unique IDs, states retain final authority over licensing decisions. The Subcommittee will establish an advisory committee and charge reasonable user fees to fund the portal's development and maintenance.
The Portal for Appraisal Licensing Act of 2025 is setting up a mandatory, centralized, cloud-based system that will change how appraisers and Appraisal Management Companies (AMCs) handle their credentials and registrations nationwide. This new system, managed by the Appraisal Subcommittee, will be the single point for submitting licenses, renewals, educational records, and paying state-specific fees. Think of it as a federal clearinghouse for the entire appraisal industry, designed to streamline bureaucracy by connecting directly with state licensing agencies (Sec. 2).
If you’re an appraiser, your days of navigating different state systems for licensing and renewals might be numbered—or at least centralized. The bill mandates the creation of the “Portal for Appraiser Credentialing and AMC Registration Information.” Every appraiser and AMC using this system will get a unique ID number, which sounds like an administrative efficiency win, ensuring nobody gets lost in the paperwork shuffle (Sec. 2). The portal is also set to track educational courses, allowing course providers and states to upload completion records directly. This could mean less time spent tracking down transcripts and more time actually appraising property, which is a clear benefit for busy professionals.
One of the biggest shifts involves background checks. For states that require criminal history checks for licensing, the Appraisal Subcommittee can now act as the middleman between the state regulator and the FBI/Department of Justice. If your state requires an FBI check, you’ll submit your fingerprints directly through the Portal. This centralized process is intended to satisfy federal oversight rules, making life easier for regulators (Sec. 2).
However, this convenience comes with a price tag. The Subcommittee is authorized to charge a “reasonable fee” to appraisers and AMCs using the system to cover the costs of its development and maintenance, including those background checks (Sec. 2). While the term “reasonable” is flexible, it means every licensed appraiser and AMC will now face a new, mandatory federal user fee just to stay in business. For an independent appraiser already juggling rising costs, this is a new layer of required expense that needs to be factored into their operating budget.
While the bill is clear that states retain the final say on approving licenses and renewals, the federal Subcommittee gains significant control over the data pipeline. The Portal will hold everything from education logs to experience records. Critically, the Subcommittee can share this sensitive applicant data with state agencies “if the Subcommittee thinks it’s appropriate” after consulting an advisory committee (Sec. 2). This lack of specific criteria for data sharing raises a flag: who decides what is “appropriate,” and under what privacy standards? Centralizing this much personal and professional data into one cloud system also means that if there’s a security breach, the personal details of the entire nation’s appraisal industry could be compromised at once.
Ultimately, this legislation is a classic trade-off: it promises significant administrative streamlining and efficiency for a highly regulated industry. But that efficiency is paid for by new, mandatory user fees and the centralization of sensitive professional data under the discretionary control of a federal agency.