This Act establishes a FEMA program to identify and address the unique capacity and logistical challenges U.S. territories face in accessing and completing disaster recovery funding under the Stafford Act.
Nydia Velázquez
Representative
NY-7
The Strengthening Capacity for Disaster Resilient Territories Act establishes a new FEMA program specifically designed to address the unique challenges U.S. territories face in accessing and utilizing federal disaster recovery funds. This program will continuously identify capability gaps, provide tailored technical assistance, and develop specialized training for territorial entities recovering from major disasters. The goal is to ensure that recovery efforts are not stalled by logistical, financial, or cultural hurdles unique to these remote locations. Congress has authorized $50 million annually for this program through Fiscal Year 2030.
We’ve all seen the news after a major hurricane or typhoon hits places like Puerto Rico or Guam. The damage is catastrophic, the recovery drags on for years, and the federal aid that’s supposed to help gets tangled up in red tape, logistics, and debt issues. This bill, the Strengthening Capacity for Disaster Resilient Territories Act, is essentially Congress saying, “We see the problem, and we’re going to fund a dedicated fix.”
This legislation sets up a new Territorial Disaster Recovery Program within FEMA, the Federal Emergency Management Agency. The goal is straightforward: figure out why U.S. territories struggle to access and manage federal recovery funds under the Stafford Act and provide highly customized technical assistance to bridge those gaps. The program is authorized to spend $50 million annually from Fiscal Year 2026 through 2030 to make this happen (SEC. 4).
Congress laid out the exact reasons why this program is necessary, and they sound familiar: massive public debt making it hard to put up local matching funds, old infrastructure that breaks easily, and the sheer difficulty of getting construction materials to remote islands. On top of that, local governments often lack the specialized staff—think engineers and grant managers—needed to navigate complex federal paperwork, and language barriers often complicate things further (SEC. 2).
This new program is designed to stop these common roadblocks. Instead of a one-size-fits-all approach, FEMA must now actively identify these specific capability gaps every two years. For example, if a small municipal office in the U.S. Virgin Islands is struggling to file the right paperwork for a road repair grant, FEMA is mandated to provide tailored technical help (SEC. 4).
The most important part for the people on the ground is the mandated customization. FEMA must specifically design its assistance to account for challenges like limited English proficiency, remote locations, and slow internet access (SEC. 4). This means the training materials can’t just be dense PDFs on a website; they need to be accessible, potentially in different languages, and delivered in person or via methods that work for areas with poor connectivity.
Think about a small business owner in the Northern Mariana Islands trying to rebuild after a typhoon. Currently, they might face a massive bureaucratic wall. Under this program, the local government entity helping them should have the specialized training and technical support from FEMA to actually get the project moving. The bill also requires FEMA to work closely with local experts and community leaders to make sure the recovery activities are relevant to the actual needs of the community (SEC. 4).
For residents and businesses in these territories, this bill promises a faster, smoother, and more effective recovery after the next big storm. If local capacity is strengthened, roads get fixed faster, power grids are rebuilt more resiliently, and housing assistance flows more efficiently. It’s about making the federal disaster safety net actually work as intended, rather than getting caught in logistical knots.
While the bill is a net positive—it’s solving a documented problem with dedicated funding—it does rely heavily on FEMA’s willingness to truly customize its approach. The definition of 'tailored help' is a little vague, and we’ll need to watch the required reports to Congress (due every two years) to ensure the agency is truly addressing the needs of remote, minority, and limited-English speaking communities, and not just offering generic training. Ultimately, this is a five-year, $250 million investment aimed at making sure that when disaster strikes, the recovery doesn't become a second disaster.