PolicyBrief
H.R. 5444
119th CongressSep 17th 2025
Medical Laboratory Personnel Shortage Relief Act of 2025
IN COMMITTEE

This Act expands the National Health Service Corps to include medical laboratory personnel and establishes a new grant program to support their education and training.

Deborah Ross
D

Deborah Ross

Representative

NC-2

LEGISLATION

New Act Puts Medical Lab Staff on Par with Doctors for Loan Repayment, Funds $25 Million Education Boost

If you’ve ever had blood drawn or a swab taken, you know the person running those tests is critical. Right now, there’s a serious shortage of medical laboratory personnel—the techs, scientists, and phlebotomists who handle the vast majority of diagnostic work. The Medical Laboratory Personnel Shortage Relief Act of 2025 is a direct shot at fixing that pipeline problem.

The Corps Expands: Loan Repayment for Lab Staff

This bill makes two big changes to the National Health Service Corps (NHSC), which is essentially the federal government’s program for putting healthcare professionals in underserved areas. First, it officially expands the definition of “health services” to include “medical laboratory services.” That might sound like bureaucratic boilerplate, but it means that for the first time, medical laboratory personnel—including lab scientists, technicians, and even phlebotomists—are officially eligible for NHSC programs.

Second, and most importantly for anyone carrying student debt, this bill expands the NHSC loan repayment program. If you have a degree in medical laboratory science, you can now qualify for loan repayment assistance if you agree to work in a designated “medical laboratory health professional target area.” This is the same deal currently offered to doctors, dentists, and nurse practitioners. For a recent graduate facing five or six figures of student loans, this is a massive incentive to take a job where they are needed most—which often means rural clinics or facilities serving low-income communities. This provision (SEC. 2) aims to make sure that when you visit a small-town clinic, they actually have the staff to run the necessary diagnostic tests without sending samples hundreds of miles away.

Building the Pipeline: $25 Million for Training

Section 3 of the bill establishes a brand-new grant program designed to boost the education side of the equation. The Secretary of Health and Human Services is authorized to hand out grants and contracts to qualified groups—like accredited hospitals and allied health schools—to start or expand accredited education programs for lab professionals. The initial funding authorized for this program is $25,000,000 for the first fiscal year, with subsequent funding authorized as needed.

The money isn’t just a blank check. The bill prioritizes funding for programs that use creative teaching methods for clinical skills and, crucially, those that focus on recruiting students from rural areas, underrepresented groups, or disadvantaged backgrounds. This is a smart move to ensure the workforce being trained actually reflects and understands the communities they will serve. It also requires the funded programs to include training on cultural competency and how to effectively work with other healthcare professionals.

The Real-World Impact

For the average person, this bill is about speed and access. If the shortage of lab staff continues, you wait longer for test results, and your doctor might have to make decisions without the full picture. By making lab staff eligible for loan repayment, the bill helps ensure that critical diagnostic services are available closer to home, especially in areas that currently struggle to attract staff. Think of a small rural hospital: If they can offer a new lab scientist $50,000 in loan repayment, they stand a much better chance of competing with big city hospitals.

While the bill is generally a win for public health infrastructure, it does give the Secretary of HHS significant power to define those new “target areas” for lab staff. The effectiveness of the loan repayment program hinges entirely on how well those shortage areas are identified and prioritized. Also, while the initial $25 million for education is a solid start, the bill leaves future funding wide open, simply stating that “whatever money is needed will be authorized” for subsequent years. This lack of a concrete cap could lead to unpredictable budgeting down the line, but for now, it signals a serious commitment to solving the problem.