This bill establishes a six-year pilot program for selected hospitals to provide medically tailored, home-delivered meals and nutrition therapy to high-risk Medicare patients upon discharge to reduce hospital readmissions.
James "Jim" McGovern
Representative
MA-2
This bill establishes a six-year pilot program for hospitals to provide medically tailored, home-delivered meals and nutrition therapy to eligible Medicare patients upon discharge. The goal is to improve health outcomes and reduce hospital readmissions for individuals with diet-sensitive conditions who have difficulty with daily living activities. Participating hospitals will receive payment for these services, which must be provided at no out-of-pocket cost to the patient. The Secretary of Health and Human Services will evaluate the program's effectiveness using data collected from the participating sites.
This bill sets up a six-year pilot program, the Medically Tailored Home-Delivered Meals Program, designed to tackle a major headache in healthcare: the revolving door of hospital readmissions. Essentially, the Secretary of Health and Human Services will select at least 40 hospitals by mid-2027 to start providing specialized, home-delivered meals and nutrition therapy to high-risk Medicare patients right after they leave the hospital. The goal is simple: use food as medicine to keep people healthy and out of the emergency room.
Not just any facility can join this program. To be an "eligible hospital," a facility must have averaged at least a three-star overall quality rating from CMS for the last two fiscal years. This is a crucial detail because it means the government is only trusting hospitals that already demonstrate a baseline level of quality care to manage this intensive post-discharge service. If a hospital is selected, it must staff up with professionals—like registered dietitians or doctors—to screen patients, provide medical nutrition therapy, and manage the meal delivery logistics. They also have to prove they can meet the Secretary’s program integrity rules, which is policy speak for making sure nobody is misusing the funds or cutting corners.
If you’re a Medicare Part A beneficiary who has a disease affected by diet, you might qualify. The bill is targeting people who are truly vulnerable: those who are living at home (not in a nursing home) and have trouble with at least two "activities of daily living" (ADLs), like bathing or dressing. If a patient is screened and deemed a “qualified individual” upon discharge, the hospital must arrange for the delivery of at least two medically tailored meals daily for a minimum of 12 weeks. These meals are designed to cover two-thirds of the person’s daily nutritional needs while respecting their specific medical requirements—think specialized diets for heart failure or diabetes. Crucially, the patient pays zero out-of-pocket for these meals or the accompanying nutrition therapy, which is required for at least 12 weeks.
This is where the bill gets interesting from a financial perspective. The money to pay for these meals and the program’s administration comes directly from the Hospital Insurance Trust Fund (Medicare Part A). However, to keep the books balanced, the Secretary must reduce payments made to standard hospitals under the existing Medicare payment system by an amount that exactly matches the cost of the meal program. This means the program isn't getting new money; it's a closed-loop system where the cost is being shifted from the Medicare Part A pot to the general hospital payment structure. While this ensures the pilot is budget-neutral for Medicare, it means that all standard hospitals—even those not participating—will see a slight reduction in their overall Medicare payments to fund this experiment. It’s essentially a system-wide cross-subsidy.
This is a pilot program, and the government is serious about measuring its impact. Participating hospitals must report extensive data so the Secretary can evaluate whether this intervention actually works. The evaluation, which will happen in two stages (intermediate and final), will compare participants to similar non-participants, focusing on hard metrics like hospital readmission rates, total Medicare spending (Part A), and patient satisfaction. They even want to know if patients would have been willing to pay for the food themselves, which gives you a sense of how much they value the service. If the data shows that 12 weeks of medically tailored meals significantly reduces readmissions and lowers overall costs, this pilot could become a permanent part of post-discharge care.