This act revokes the 2000 proclamation establishing the Ironwood Forest National Monument and prohibits future monument designations in that area without an act of Congress.
Paul Gosar
Representative
AZ-9
The Southern Arizona Protection Act revokes Presidential Proclamation 7320 concerning the Ironwood Forest area in Arizona. This legislation specifically prohibits the designation or extension of any new national monuments within the boundaries generally shown on the June 12, 2000 map for the Ironwood Forest National Monument. Future monument designations in this area will require an act of Congress.
The aptly named Southern Arizona Protection Act is short, but it packs a punch by targeting specific public land protections in Arizona. This bill’s main goal is to entirely wipe out Presidential Proclamation 7320, which has been protecting the Ironwood Forest area since June 9, 2000. Essentially, the bill takes the existing conservation status off the table immediately.
For those who aren’t policy wonks, presidential proclamations under the Antiquities Act are often used to designate National Monuments, giving them federal protection to preserve historical, cultural, or natural features. When this bill is enacted, all the rules and protections established by the 2000 proclamation for the Ironwood Forest area are gone, effective immediately (SEC. 2).
What’s more, the bill doesn't just undo the past; it blocks the future. It explicitly states that the government cannot use existing authority—like the Antiquities Act—to designate or extend any new national monument within the area defined by the 2000 monument map unless Congress passes a brand new law specifically authorizing it (SEC. 2). This is a hard stop on executive action for conservation in this specific geographic area.
If you live in Southern Arizona or value the state’s natural resources, this bill matters because it removes a significant layer of federal protection. The Ironwood Forest area is known for its biodiversity, including its namesake ironwood trees, and important archaeological sites. By repealing Proclamation 7320, the land is immediately subject to different management rules, potentially opening it up to uses that were previously restricted, such as resource extraction, mining, or certain types of development.
For environmental advocates and conservation groups, this is a major setback. The bill strips away a two-decade-old conservation designation and prevents any future president from stepping in to protect the land quickly using the Antiquities Act. For businesses or individuals interested in using this public land for economic purposes—like grazing or certain types of recreation—this change could be seen as a benefit, as it reduces federal oversight and conservation-focused restrictions.
This legislation is a clear attempt to shift control over this specific piece of public land from the executive branch (the President) to the legislative branch (Congress). By requiring a specific act of Congress for future monument designation, the bill ensures that any large-scale conservation effort for Ironwood Forest must survive the often slow and complex legislative process. While some argue this increases democratic control over land use, it also makes it significantly harder to enact conservation measures quickly, leaving the area vulnerable to development pressures in the interim. The immediate effect is a reduction in environmental safeguards for a historically protected landscape.