This act establishes the Expanding Childcare in Rural America Initiative to prioritize federal funding for improving the availability, quality, and affordability of childcare in rural and agricultural communities.
Marie Gluesenkamp Perez
Representative
WA-3
The Expanding Childcare in Rural America Act of 2025 establishes a new initiative to improve the availability, quality, and affordability of childcare in rural and agricultural areas. This program directs the Secretary of Agriculture to prioritize funding through existing rural development loan and grant programs for projects that address childcare needs. The initiative specifically favors farming-dependent counties and requires a comprehensive review of the program's impact.
If you live in a rural area, you know finding reliable childcare can be a nightmare. It’s expensive, the options are limited, and sometimes you have to drive half an hour just to drop off your kid. The Expanding Childcare in Rural America Act of 2025 is trying to fix that by setting up a new program called the Expanding Childcare in Rural America Initiative, run by the Department of Agriculture (USDA) from fiscal years 2026 through 2030. The core idea is simple: use existing USDA rural development money, but make childcare projects the top priority. This means more facilities, better quality, and hopefully, lower costs for families in farming and rural communities (SEC. 2).
This isn't about creating a whole new pot of money; it's about telling the USDA how to spend the money it already has. The initiative mandates that when the Secretary of Agriculture hands out loans and grants through several established rural development programs—like those for community facilities, business development, and microentrepreneur assistance—they must prioritize applicants who are focused on improving childcare availability, quality, or affordability. This priority rule is powerful; it overrides any other existing selection criteria (SEC. 2). For example, if a rural town applies for a community facility loan to build a new library, but another applicant in the same county applies to renovate a derelict building into a licensed daycare center, the childcare project gets the advantage.
To ensure the money goes where the need is greatest, the bill gives extra priority to communities in counties defined as “farming-dependent” based on 2015 data. They also have to make sure the benefits are spread out geographically, which could get tricky when balancing the need to prioritize farming counties against the requirement to disperse funds evenly (SEC. 2). The bill defines "childcare" broadly, including licensed providers, school-based programs, and facilities that meet health and safety rules, covering care for kids not yet in kindergarten (SEC. 2).
For rural parents, this shift could be huge. If you’re a parent trying to work the fields or run a small business, this legislation could mean the difference between having a functioning, affordable daycare down the road and having to quit your job because you can’t find a spot for your three-year-old. The USDA is allowed to work with experienced intermediaries—like community development financial institutions (CDFIs) or local childcare resource and referral groups—to distribute the money. This means the funding won't just go to massive government projects; it can be channeled through local experts who know how to help a family start a home-based daycare or help an existing facility expand (SEC. 2).
However, there’s a flip side to this prioritization. The USDA runs programs that fund all sorts of essential rural projects—water systems, fire stations, hospitals, and infrastructure. While these programs aren't losing money, applicants who aren't focused on childcare might find it harder to win grants and loans, as their projects will now take a backseat to childcare initiatives. A small town looking to upgrade its aging water treatment plant might find itself competing against a high-priority application to build a new daycare facility. This is the trade-off: a focused effort to solve the childcare crisis means other crucial rural needs might face increased competition for limited funds.
Ultimately, the Secretary of Agriculture is required to track all the projects funded under this initiative and report back to Congress within three years, detailing the economic and social impact (SEC. 2). This evaluation will be key to understanding if this targeted shift in funding truly moves the needle on the rural childcare shortage or just shifts resources around.