This Act generally prohibits employers from using credit history checks when making most employment decisions, with narrow exceptions for national security roles.
Steve Cohen
Representative
TN-9
The Equal Employment for All Act of 2025 significantly restricts employers from using consumer credit reports when making most hiring or employment decisions. This means employers are generally banned from considering your credit history, even if you consent, unless the job requires a national security clearance or is mandated by other specific laws. Furthermore, the bill prohibits penalizing applicants who refuse to authorize a credit check for non-exempt positions.
The Equal Employment for All Act of 2025 is straightforward: it generally stops employers from using your credit history—meaning your creditworthiness, standing, or capacity—when deciding whether to hire you or keep you on staff. Think of it as a major firewall placed between your personal financial struggles and your professional employment prospects. This rule applies even if you’re willing to sign a waiver, meaning employers can’t just bypass it by asking for your permission (Sec. 2).
For years, employers have used credit checks as a quick screening tool. If you had medical debt, went through a messy divorce, or just had bad luck during the 2008 recession, that information could easily cost you a job, even if the role had nothing to do with handling money. This bill aims to stop that practice cold. The core change is a massive amendment to the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA), making it illegal for an employer to use a consumer report that includes credit details for most employment decisions. This is a huge win for anyone who’s ever had a financial setback and worried it would haunt their career prospects. Now, that past-due bill won't automatically disqualify you from a job you're otherwise qualified for.
If you’re wondering if there are any loopholes, the answer is yes, but they are incredibly small. An employer can still check your credit history in only two specific scenarios: first, if the job requires you to hold a national security clearance; and second, if another specific law mandates a credit check for that particular position (Sec. 2). That’s it. If you’re applying to manage a local retail store, work in construction, or code software, your credit score is officially off the table. Crucially, the bill also states that if your job doesn’t fall into one of those narrow exceptions, an employer cannot penalize you or deny you the job just because you refused to authorize the credit check. You can’t be punished for exercising your right to privacy.
This bill directly benefits millions of job seekers and current employees. If you have a thin credit file or have been rebuilding your credit, this removes a significant, often unfair, barrier to employment. It levels the playing field by forcing employers to focus on skills and experience, not financial history. On the flip side, employers who have relied on credit checks—especially those in financial services or executive roles—will need to adjust their screening processes immediately. While existing regulations often allow checks for high-level financial positions, this bill tightens the screws considerably. The goal here isn’t to make hiring harder, but to make it fairer, ensuring that an unexpected medical bill from three years ago doesn't derail your career trajectory today.