The FLAME Act establishes notification and reimbursement procedures for significant cancellations of training courses offered by the National Academy for Fire Prevention and Control and mandates a GAO study on the impact of such cancellations.
April McClain Delaney
Representative
MD-6
The Firefighter Learning And Management Education (FLAME) Act establishes new notification requirements for the Administrator of the U.S. Fire Administration when large-scale cancellations of National Academy for Fire Prevention and Control courses occur. It mandates timely notification to Congress and affected students regarding any significant course reductions. Furthermore, the bill allows fire departments to seek reimbursement for incurred expenses if a course is cancelled for reasons other than "good cause" and requires a GAO study on the impact of these cancellations.
The new Firefighter Learning And Management Education Act (FLAME Act) is all about bringing accountability and transparency to how the federal government manages training for the nation’s fire service. Think of it as a new set of rules for the National Academy for Fire Prevention and Control (located in Emmitsburg, Maryland), which is basically the central hub for training tens of thousands of firefighters and first responders every year.
The core of the FLAME Act focuses on what the bill calls a “large-scale cancellation action.” This is defined as cancelling 25% or more of all planned courses at the Academy in a single fiscal year. If the Administrator of the U.S. Fire Administration decides to pull the plug on that many courses, they can’t just send out a mass email. The bill mandates strict notification requirements: Congress must be told at least 60 days in advance, and affected students and their department heads must be notified at least 45 days before the course starts (or immediately if it’s a true emergency).
Why does this matter to you? The findings section of the bill points out that this training is crucial for coordinating national disaster response, especially with threats like wildfires increasing. If a big chunk of specialized training—like advanced incident command or structural collapse rescue—is suddenly cancelled, it doesn't just affect the individual firefighter; it affects the preparedness of the entire community they serve. This provision ensures that if national readiness is going to be significantly downgraded, Congress gets a heads-up and a detailed list of who is affected.
Perhaps the most impactful section for local fire departments and taxpayers deals with money. If a course is cancelled, the affected fire department can now apply to FEMA for reimbursement for “covered expenses.” This isn't just about travel costs; the bill specifically includes “backfill expenses.”
Here’s the real-world scenario: A small-town fire chief sends two firefighters to the Academy for a week of critical training. To cover their shifts, the chief pays overtime to existing staff or hires temporary personnel—that’s the backfill expense. If the federal course cancels at the last minute, the department is stuck with the overtime bill and no training to show for it. Under the FLAME Act, if the course cancellation wasn't for “good cause” (like the facility closing, an instructor getting sick, or a national emergency), the department can submit an itemized list of these costs and get reimbursed within 90 days.
This is a huge win for local budgets, ensuring that federal operational changes don't unfairly punish local departments that are already stretching their resources. However, it’s worth noting that the definition of “good cause” is key here. If the Administrator uses a broad interpretation of “national emergency” or “facility closing,” it could still leave departments holding the bag. The bill gives FEMA 90 days to process and pay these claims, adding a new administrative burden to the agency.
Finally, the FLAME Act mandates that the Government Accountability Office (GAO) conduct a study and report back to Congress by March 30, 2026. This study will analyze the impact of any large-scale cancellations that happen in 2025, look at how the Academy helps first responders coordinate during disasters, and detail attendance trends over the last three years—specifically tracking how many students took in-person versus virtual courses. This is essential data collection that should help policymakers understand whether virtual training is effectively replacing the traditional, on-campus experience, and where the training gaps are most acute.