PolicyBrief
H.R. 5286
119th CongressSep 10th 2025
Humane Transport of Farmed Animals Act
IN COMMITTEE

This Act strengthens enforcement for humane animal transport and prohibits the interstate movement of unfit livestock, with an exception for veterinary care.

Dina Titus
D

Dina Titus

Representative

NV-1

LEGISLATION

New Farm Animal Transport Bill Bans Interstate Shipment of Sick, Injured Livestock

If you’ve ever seen a truck full of cows or pigs on the highway and wondered how those animals are doing, this bill is for you. The Humane Transport of Farmed Animals Act is essentially the federal government saying, “We need better rules, and we’re going to actually enforce them.” It tackles two big issues: who checks the carriers and what condition the animals have to be in to travel.

Beefing Up the Enforcement Checkpoints

The first major change is creating a real inspection mechanism. Right now, rules about how animals are transported exist in federal code (Section 80502 of title 49), but enforcement can be spotty. This bill mandates that the Secretary of Transportation and the Secretary of Agriculture must set up a system within 180 days to investigate and inspect any carrier—truck, train, or boat—moving farm animals across state lines. They can look at the physical transport and all the related paperwork.

Think of it like this: the agencies are being told to hire the inspectors and write the playbook for enforcement. This is a big deal for transportation companies (rail, trucking, and express carriers) because it means increased oversight. If you run a shipping company, you’ll need to make sure your records and your vehicles are ready for a federal inspection, which could mean new compliance costs and operational procedures, but the goal is to make sure carriers are following existing law.

Drawing a Hard Line on 'Unfit to Travel'

The most significant change for farmers, ranchers, and livestock haulers is the firm ban on moving livestock interstate if they are deemed “unfit to travel.” The bill doesn't mess around with vague language here; it adopts specific, detailed standards from the World Organisation for Animal Health’s international code. This means the rules are clear, objective, and they will automatically update as the international code updates—a point that gives regulatory agencies a lot of power without needing new legislation every time standards change.

So, what makes an animal "unfit"? The list is long and specific, designed to prevent suffering during transit. You can’t ship an animal across state lines if it is: sick, hurt, disabled, unable to stand or bear weight on all legs, completely blind in both eyes, or if moving it would cause it more suffering. It also bans the transport of newborns whose navels haven't healed, and animals in the last 10% of their pregnancy (the very end). For the producers, this means you can’t just load up a compromised animal and ship it off; you have to treat it on-site or send it for immediate vet care.

The Vet Care Exception and Real-World Impact

There is one critical exception: the ban does not apply if the sole reason for the interstate transport is to get necessary veterinary care. This prevents a situation where a farmer is forced to let an animal suffer on the farm because they can’t legally transport it to the nearest animal hospital across state lines. This is a practical carve-out that recognizes the reality of rural healthcare access.

For the industry, this bill means higher standards and potentially higher short-term costs for compliance and animal management, but it aims to reduce the public visibility of animal suffering during transport. For the rest of us, it means that the food supply chain is being held to a higher standard of animal welfare, ensuring that the animals we rely on are not being subjected to unnecessary suffering while they move from farm to processing.