PolicyBrief
H.R. 528
119th CongressJul 23rd 2025
Post-Disaster Reforestation and Restoration Act of 2025
AWAITING HOUSE

This Act establishes a program for the Secretary of the Interior to coordinate and fund the reforestation and restoration of federal lands damaged by unplanned disasters like wildfires or insect outbreaks.

Brittany Pettersen
D

Brittany Pettersen

Representative

CO-7

LEGISLATION

New Act Mandates Annual Restoration of Federal Lands Damaged by Wildfire and Pests

The Post-Disaster Reforestation and Restoration Act of 2025 is essentially the federal government’s new, structured cleanup crew for forests hammered by unexpected ecological disasters. Think massive wildfires, or those devastating insect outbreaks that leave behind huge tracts of dead trees. Instead of waiting and hoping nature bounces back—which often doesn't happen after severe damage—this bill establishes a formal program to actively restore and replant.

The Cleanup Crew Gets Organized

This Act puts the Secretary of the Interior in charge of identifying and fixing federal lands that won't recover naturally after what the bill calls an “unplanned disturbance.” This means that no later than one year after the law passes, the government has to start scouting and mapping out all the areas that need replanting and restoration. This isn't a one-time thing; they have to do this every single year, teaming up with agencies like the Forest Service and the Bureau of Indian Affairs to keep the list current. This structured approach means that post-disaster recovery should become systematic rather than sporadic.

How the Work Gets Done: Grants and Partnerships

For those of us who deal with contracts and projects, the implementation plan is key. The bill outlines that the restoration work—the actual replanting and ecosystem recovery—will be executed through competitive grants, contracts, and cooperative agreements. This is important because it means the work isn't just internal government labor. The bill explicitly mandates reaching out to a wide range of partners, including Indian Tribes, state and local governments, universities, and even neighboring land managers. For a small, specialized nursery or an environmental consulting firm, this opens up a new stream of potential federal contracts focused specifically on ecological recovery. Crucially, the bill also allows funding for projects aimed at making sure there are enough seeds and seedlings available, addressing a major bottleneck in large-scale reforestation efforts.

Tracking the Progress (and the Costs)

Accountability is baked into this law. Within two years, and annually afterward, the Secretary must send a detailed report to Congress. This report has to cover everything: which lands need work, which projects were prioritized, who got the grants and contracts, and, critically, any gaps they see in the supply of seeds and seedlings. They also have to recommend dedicated funding to tackle any existing backlog of restoration needs. While this transparency is good for oversight, that request for "dedicated funding" is where the costs hit home for taxpayers. A massive backlog of restoration needs could translate into significant new spending requests down the line, potentially adding to the federal budget burden.

The Real-World Impact

For anyone living near federal land—whether you hike there, rely on its water, or work in an industry connected to it—this bill stabilizes the ecosystem. A systematic approach to restoration means faster recovery after a fire, which can reduce erosion, protect water quality, and stabilize local wildlife habitats. For example, if you live downstream from a wildfire zone, this program aims to get the trees back faster, preventing massive mudslides that could damage your property or infrastructure. While the overall goal is beneficial—a dedicated fund for fixing damaged nature—the devil is in the details of implementation. The Secretary of the Interior holds significant power in deciding which projects are prioritized, and the broad definition of an “unplanned disturbance” means we’ll need to watch closely to ensure the program focuses on the most urgent, large-scale disasters, rather than stretching the funds too thin on smaller issues.