PolicyBrief
H.R. 5232
119th CongressSep 9th 2025
Domestic Jobs Protection Act
IN COMMITTEE

This act updates the definition of "unauthorized alien" in employment verification law by removing the reference to the Attorney General.

Brandon Gill
R

Brandon Gill

Representative

TX-26

LEGISLATION

Domestic Jobs Protection Act Tweaks Definition of 'Unauthorized Alien' in Employment Law

The “Domestic Jobs Protection Act” kicks off with a highly technical, but important, adjustment to immigration law. Specifically, Section 2 of this Act cleans up the definition of an “unauthorized alien” as it applies to employment verification rules. The key move here is removing the specific phrase “or by the Attorney General” from Section 274A(h)(3) of the Immigration and Nationality Act.

The Fine Print of Employment Status

For most people, this change won’t show up on their pay stubs or in their daily work routines, but it matters for the agencies and lawyers who have to enforce or comply with the law. The existing law defines who is an “unauthorized alien” for the purposes of employment—meaning, who employers are prohibited from hiring. By removing the reference to the Attorney General, the definition now relies solely on the remaining statutory criteria set by Congress. This is basically an administrative cleanup, aiming to streamline or clarify the legal definition by taking out what might be redundant or outdated language regarding the Attorney General’s role in defining this status.

Why This Matters (or Doesn't) for the Real World

Think of this like updating the terms and conditions on a piece of software: the core function remains the same, but the legal language governing it gets tidied up. For employers using systems like E-Verify, this specific change doesn't alter their current obligations to check employee authorization. The process of verifying a new hire’s status remains dependent on the criteria that Congress has laid out in the statute. For the average worker, whether they are managing a small business or working on a construction site, the immediate, practical impact is zero. This is a change for the people who write the rulebooks, not for the people following them, ensuring that the legal framework for employment authorization is consistent and unambiguous across the board.