PolicyBrief
H.R. 5211
119th CongressSep 8th 2025
Peace Officer Standards and Training Agency Information Access Clarification Act
IN COMMITTEE

This bill clarifies the information sharing requirements for the FBI with various state, local, and tribal law enforcement and standards-setting agencies, while also updating relevant definitions.

Derek Schmidt
R

Derek Schmidt

Representative

KS-2

LEGISLATION

FBI Information Sharing Law Updated: Clarifying Data Access for State Police Certification Agencies

The Peace Officer Standards and Training Agency Information Access Clarification Act is essentially a piece of administrative cleanup that focuses on making sure the right hand knows what the left hand is doing when it comes to law enforcement data.

The bill mandates that the Attorney General update rules to ensure the FBI can exchange records and information with authorized officials from state governments, the U.S. Sentencing Commission, and, most importantly, state agencies that set the standards for police officers—known as "peace officer standards and training agencies" (POST agencies). The goal here is procedural: to formalize and streamline the flow of critical information from the federal level down to the state bodies responsible for certifying, training, and overseeing local police officers.

Defining the Gatekeepers of Police Standards

The biggest change this bill makes isn't in what information is shared, but who is officially allowed to receive it. The Act formally defines a "peace officer standards and training agency" as a state agency with the legal authority to set rules for the hiring, training, ethical conduct, and employment of law enforcement officers through certification or licensing. Think of these agencies as the HR and quality control departments for local police forces. Before this, the language wasn't as explicit in federal rules (Section 2).

Why does this matter to you? If a police officer is involved in a serious incident or has a history of misconduct, the POST agency is often the body that decides whether that officer keeps their certification and their job. By clarifying that the FBI must share relevant records with these agencies, the bill helps ensure that state oversight bodies have the federal data they need to make informed decisions about who gets to wear a badge. It’s a move toward better accountability through better data access.

The Administrative Clock is Ticking

This legislation isn't just a suggestion; it’s a mandate for action. The Attorney General is required to review and update the relevant federal regulations (specifically part 20 of title 28 of the Code of Federal Regulations) within 180 days of the bill becoming law. This deadline means the administrative gears must start turning quickly to align the federal rules with the new, clearer definitions and expanded information-sharing requirements (Section 2).

In the grand scheme, this bill won’t change your daily commute or your tax bill. Instead, its impact is felt in the backend of the criminal justice system. It’s about tightening up the procedural language that governs how federal and state law enforcement agencies communicate. For the busy person, this means less bureaucratic friction in the system designed to vet and monitor the police officers serving your community, making the oversight process clearer and hopefully more effective.