PolicyBrief
H.R. 5193
119th CongressSep 8th 2025
To direct the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff to conduct a feasibility study on incorporating militarily-relevant applications of emerging biotechnology into wargaming exercises, and for other purposes.
IN COMMITTEE

This bill directs the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff to study the feasibility of integrating militarily relevant applications of emerging biotechnology into military wargaming exercises.

Ro Khanna
D

Ro Khanna

Representative

CA-17

LEGISLATION

Military Ordered to Study Biotech Wargames: What Soldier Enhancements and Adversary Threats Mean for Future Defense

This legislation requires the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff to conduct a feasibility study on integrating militarily relevant emerging biotechnology into military wargaming exercises. Essentially, the Pentagon needs to figure out if—and how—they should start modeling future wars that include things like high-tech soldier enhancements and new bio-based weapons. This study, which must be reported to Congress within 180 days, is a mandate to modernize how the military plans for the next generation of threats.

The Future of Fighting: Bio-Boosted Soldiers?

The study isn't just about traditional biological weapons; it’s about next-level tech. The Chairman is specifically tasked with looking at how biotechnology could boost a soldier’s cognitive (thinking) skills or physical abilities. Think less Captain America super-serum and more targeted, cutting-edge performance enhancement that could change what a human can endure or process on the battlefield. They also need to look at new chemicals or materials derived from biotech that could give the military a strategic edge. This is about making sure military planners aren't playing chess with yesterday’s pieces when the future battlefield might involve genetically engineered materials or performance-optimized personnel.

Anticipating the Adversary

A critical part of this analysis is looking outward. The bill requires the study to specifically consider how enemies might use emerging biotechnology for military ends—going beyond the traditional definition of biological weapons. This is the government’s way of saying, “We need to anticipate the worst-case scenario.” If a rival nation develops a new material or a way to temporarily enhance their own troops, the U.S. needs to have already gamed out the response. This foresight is crucial for national security, ensuring that military strategy doesn't lag behind scientific breakthroughs.

Who’s Reading the Fine Print

To make sure this study is grounded in reality, the Chairman can't just operate in a vacuum. The bill mandates consultation with the commanders of the combatant commands (the generals running operations worldwide) and, crucially, outside experts. This is a smart move because the fastest breakthroughs in biotech often happen in the private sector or academia, not necessarily inside the Department of Defense (DoD). By pulling in external expertise, the study aims to capture the latest advancements that the military needs to be aware of. The final report must not only recommend changes to current wargames but also include a plan to keep those games regularly updated, acknowledging that biotech advances move fast. While this is primarily an administrative study, it signals a major shift in how the DoD views future warfare, focusing on the intersection of biology and technology—a development that will eventually trickle down to affect research funding, defense contracts, and the very definition of military readiness.