PolicyBrief
H.R. 5187
119th CongressSep 8th 2025
To establish in the Department of Defense a program to support the expansion of domestic bioindustrial manufacturing capacity.
IN COMMITTEE

This bill establishes a Department of Defense program to support and expand domestic bioindustrial manufacturing capacity for critical products.

Ro Khanna
D

Ro Khanna

Representative

CA-17

LEGISLATION

DoD Launches New 10-Year Program to Fund Domestic Bio-Factories: Boosting US Supply Chains for Critical Products

The Department of Defense (DoD) is getting into the industrial funding game, but with a high-tech twist. This bill establishes the Bioindustrial Commercialization Program, essentially a 10-year plan to hand out competitive grants to private U.S. companies. The goal? To help these businesses build, upgrade, or retool their manufacturing plants—called “eligible bioindustrial manufacturing facilities”—so they can start pumping out “critical biomanufactured products” right here at home.

Think of this as the government deciding that relying on overseas factories for key biological materials—everything from specialized fuels to advanced medical components—is a bad idea. Within a year of this bill becoming law, the DoD must launch the program to start funneling money toward domestic production capacity. This is about making sure that if a global supply chain hiccup happens, we can still make the stuff the military, and potentially the rest of us, need.

The Science Behind the Spend

What exactly is biomanufacturing? The bill defines it clearly: it’s using living systems—like cells or microbes—to create or improve commercial products, tools, or processes. This is the stuff that drives next-generation materials and pharmaceuticals. The catch is that the DoD gets to decide what a “critical biomanufactured product” is, giving the Secretary of Defense a lot of power over where this money goes. This is the kind of detail that matters, because whoever defines “critical” defines the priority.

When companies apply for these grants, the DoD isn’t just looking for a good idea; they’re looking for strategic value. They must prioritize proposals that strengthen U.S. supply chains and meet the needs of future service members. They also favor facilities that can easily switch production to different products if necessary (flexibility is key) and those that help spread manufacturing capacity across the country, rather than concentrating it in a few spots. They even prefer facilities located near raw material sources or existing manufacturing hubs, which is smart logistics.

What This Means for the Real World

If you’re running a small biotech startup that has figured out how to make sustainable aircraft fuel using algae, or a company that can bio-engineer specialized protective fabrics, this program is potentially your ticket to scaling up. The money can be used for the physical setup or upgrade of the factory floor, and even for developing the necessary business and technical plans to get the facility operational. For the average person, this push for domestic production should translate into more resilient supply chains, potentially insulating us from some of the price spikes and shortages caused by relying heavily on foreign production.

However, there’s always a cost. This is a significant government investment, meaning taxpayers are footing the bill to boost this specific sector. While the goal is national security and economic benefit, the immediate impact is a transfer of public funds to private companies. Furthermore, the bill mandates that award recipients must sign an agreement with the DoD to actually supply those critical products once production is up and running. This isn't just a grant; it's a contract for future goods, cementing the link between the funded companies and the military supply chain.

Oversight and the Sunset Clause

The bill does include important checks. Companies that receive funding must report back regularly to the DoD on their progress, including when they expect to start manufacturing and what they’ll be making. In turn, the Secretary of Defense must provide Congress with a detailed annual report listing every award, the amount, the location, and how the facility aligns with national security goals. This level of transparency is crucial for tracking how effectively taxpayer money is being used.

Finally, the program isn't forever. It’s scheduled to end 10 years after enactment—a “sunset clause.” But here’s the fine print that gives policy analysts pause: the President can extend the program indefinitely if they determine it's necessary to protect national economic or security interests. While this power is understandable in a crisis, it means a program intended to be temporary could become permanent without further Congressional review, depending on who is in the Oval Office a decade from now.