PolicyBrief
H.R. 5168
119th CongressSep 8th 2025
Puerto Rico Nutrition Assistance Fairness Act
IN COMMITTEE

This bill formally integrates Puerto Rico into the federal Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) structure, outlining a transition plan away from its current block grant system.

Pablo José Hernández Rivera
D

Pablo José Hernández Rivera

Representative

PR

LEGISLATION

Proposed Bill Integrates Puerto Rico into Federal SNAP Program, But Full Change Won’t Hit Until 2034

If you’ve ever tried to manage a budget while juggling rising grocery prices, you know how critical nutrition assistance programs are. This bill, the Puerto Rico Nutrition Assistance Fairness Act, aims to fundamentally change how food aid is handled in Puerto Rico by moving it out of its current system—a fixed block grant—and integrating it fully into the federal Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), the program used across the 50 states and Guam.

The Shift from Block Grant to Federal SNAP

Right now, Puerto Rico receives a lump sum, a block grant, to run its nutrition program. This bill essentially tears up that old playbook, requiring the territory to transition to the standard SNAP rules used everywhere else. Section 2 of the bill updates the definition sections of the Food and Nutrition Act of 2008 to explicitly include Puerto Rico alongside Guam and Hawaii, ensuring that eligibility rules and program definitions apply consistently. For residents of Puerto Rico, this means that the rules for who qualifies for aid and how much they receive would eventually be determined by the same federal standards that apply in, say, New York or Texas. This move is designed to create a more stable and needs-responsive system, rather than one capped by a fixed annual grant.

The Transition Roadmap: Plan, Review, and Wait

The transition isn’t happening overnight. Section 3 sets a clear roadmap: Puerto Rico has 180 days after designating an agency to submit a detailed plan of operation to the Secretary of Agriculture, essentially outlining how they will run the federal SNAP program. The Secretary must provide technical assistance during this time, which is crucial—it’s like giving them the instruction manual and the tech support before the big system upgrade. Once the plan is submitted, the Secretary has another 180 days to review it. If approved, Section 4 allows the existing block grant funding to continue for up to five years to ensure people don't lose access to food aid while the new system is built. This five-year buffer is a smart move, guaranteeing that the lights stay on during the administrative overhaul.

The Catch: A Decade-Long Delay

Here’s where the policy gets a little tricky, and frankly, frustrating. While the bill sets up the entire framework for a fairer, integrated system, Section 7 dictates that the actual amendments—the changes that bring Puerto Rico into SNAP—will not take effect until 10 years after the date the Act is signed into law. This means that while the planning and transition steps (like submitting the 180-day plan) can start immediately, the real-world benefit of being under the federal SNAP umbrella, with all its protections and funding stability, is pushed off for a full decade. For the 25-45 crowd juggling budgets and looking for stability, a ten-year wait for a promised improvement is a significant delay that undercuts the immediate fairness the bill title suggests.

What Happens to the Money?

Section 5 addresses the funding mechanism once the transition is complete. After the transition period, Puerto Rico’s funding will be calculated based on 0.4 percent of the total national SNAP aggregate, adjusted annually for inflation using the “thrifty food plan.” This is a technical way of saying the funding will be tied to actual need and rising food costs, rather than the old fixed block grant amount. For American Samoa, which also uses a block grant, the bill ensures that after Puerto Rico’s transition, 100 percent of specific federal funds will be dedicated to covering the costs of running their program. Essentially, the bill cleans up the funding structure for both territories, setting the stage for more predictable and needs-based support—but again, this is a future promise, not an immediate reality.