This Act mandates that defense contractors provide the Department of Defense with fair and reasonable access to necessary repair materials, parts, tools, and information for the equipment they sell.
Marie Gluesenkamp Perez
Representative
WA-3
The Warrior Right to Repair Act of 2025 mandates that defense contractors provide the Department of Defense (DoD) fair and reasonable access to necessary repair materials, including parts, tools, and technical information, under terms equal to those offered to authorized third parties. This act requires the DoD to review existing contracts to remove intellectual property barriers preventing the military from performing its own maintenance and repairs on acquired equipment. The goal is to ensure the DoD can efficiently maintain and fix the advanced systems it purchases.
The Warrior Right to Repair Act of 2025 is straightforward: it forces defense contractors to give the Department of Defense (DoD) the keys, the tools, and the instruction manuals needed to fix the expensive, high-tech gear the military buys. This isn't just about spare tires; it covers everything from complex vehicles to digital electronics, ensuring the military can maintain its equipment without being totally reliant on the original manufacturer.
Under this bill, when the government buys equipment, the contractor must agree to grant the DoD "fair and reasonable access" to all repair materials. Think of it like buying a new washing machine: currently, the manufacturer often controls who can fix it, forcing you back to them for expensive, slow repairs. This bill says the military—the customer—should have the same access to parts, specialized diagnostic tools, and technical information as any repair shop authorized by the manufacturer (SEC. 2). This means the DoD gets the same prices, terms, and delivery options offered to anyone else. If the manufacturer doesn't authorize anyone else, the government gets to decide what 'fair price and terms' actually are.
This is a big deal because modern equipment is often locked down by software. The bill specifically defines "tool" to include any necessary software or hardware used for diagnosis, maintenance, or repair, including the software needed to program, calibrate, or pair a new part. This is the digital equivalent of making sure the military doesn't just get a replacement motherboard but also the proprietary software needed to make the new board talk to the rest of the system. For the military, this means less downtime and greater readiness—they can fix things faster in-house or hire a competitive third party, rather than waiting for a contractor’s specialized technician to fly in.
Beyond just getting access, the Secretary of Defense is required to actively review and modify existing equipment contracts to eliminate intellectual property (IP) restrictions that currently stop the DoD from doing its own maintenance (SEC. 3). For years, contractors have successfully used IP claims to limit who can touch their gear, creating a lucrative, captive repair market. This bill aims to untangle that mess, making sure that if the military owns the hardware, they also have the right to repair it.
This move is great for the taxpayer because competition usually drives down costs. However, it’s a direct hit to the business model of defense contractors who rely on those restrictive repair contracts for ongoing revenue. Their proprietary data and specialized tools—which are currently protected—will now have to be shared with the DoD maintenance teams.
The bill does include a potential escape hatch, but it’s heavily regulated. For older, existing programs, the head of the contracting agency can waive this new repair requirement. But they can’t just shrug it off. They must submit a detailed justification to Congress, based on an independent technical assessment, explaining exactly why the waiver is necessary and how enforcing the repair right would negatively impact the program's costs, schedule, or performance (SEC. 2). This prevents blanket exemptions and puts the burden of proof squarely on the agency to justify why the military must remain dependent on the contractor.
To ensure this isn't just a paper tiger, the Comptroller General of the United States—the government’s chief auditor—must report to Congress within one year on how well the DoD is actually implementing this new rule (SEC. 2). This provides an important layer of oversight, ensuring the military is moving forward with the new repair capabilities and the contractors are complying with the access requirements.