PolicyBrief
H.R. 5047
119th CongressAug 26th 2025
No Woke Indoctrination of Military Kids Act
IN COMMITTEE

This bill prohibits the Department of Defense Education Activity from using funds for instruction in Critical Race Theory and restricts most Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEIA) practices within military schools.

Nancy Mace
R

Nancy Mace

Representative

SC-1

LEGISLATION

Military School Bill Bans CRT and DEIA Programs: Secretary of Defense Must Act Within 60 Days

The “No Woke Indoctrination of Military Kids Act” is a direct mandate to the Department of Defense Education Activity (DoDEA), which runs schools for military families worldwide. Simply put, this bill cuts off all DoDEA funding for anything related to Critical Race Theory (CRT) and most Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Accessibility (DEIA) activities. If passed, the Secretary of Defense has up to 60 days to implement the sweeping changes.

The Curriculum Firewall: What’s Banned in Class

Section 2 of the bill creates a strict firewall, preventing DoDEA funds from being used to teach, promote, or even purchase materials that include CRT concepts. But this isn’t just about the term “Critical Race Theory”—the bill provides a very specific, extensive definition of what is banned. This includes prohibiting teaching that one race is inherently superior, that a person is inherently racist just because of their race or sex, or that the U.S. is fundamentally racist.

Crucially, the ban also targets specific historical or sociological critiques. For instance, it prohibits teaching that the idea of meritocracy is inherently racist or sexist, or that the Declaration of Independence or the U.S. Constitution are fundamentally racist documents. For a high school history teacher in an overseas DoDEA school, this broad definition means they’ll have to carefully vet curriculum to ensure discussions about historical injustices, systemic issues, or even modern debates over equity don't accidentally cross the line into one of the nine prohibited concepts.

End of the Line for DEIA Offices

Section 3 takes aim at the administrative side, effectively dismantling most DEIA infrastructure within DoDEA. The Director would be prohibited from maintaining any office focused on diversity or equity, employing a Chief Diversity Officer, creating strategic DEIA plans, or running affinity groups based on characteristics like race or sexual orientation. If you’re a DoDEA employee currently working in a DEIA role—say, coordinating inclusion training or running a data dashboard on equity—your job function, and possibly your role itself, would be eliminated.

There are two key exceptions: the bill explicitly allows DoDEA to maintain offices that handle standard Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO) functions and those that enforce the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), provided they operate as they historically have. This means the basic framework for preventing workplace discrimination remains, but the proactive, strategic elements of modern DEIA programs are gone. For military families and staff who rely on DEIA programs for support or cultural awareness, these resources would disappear, leaving only the traditional compliance offices.

The Real-World Enforcement Mechanism

Section 4 gives teeth to the law by establishing an enforcement mechanism. The Secretary of Defense is tasked with ensuring compliance, and any DoD employee or contractor who intentionally violates the Act faces disciplinary action, potentially including suspension or firing. This is a significant threat to educators; if a teacher uses a banned concept in a lesson, they could lose their job.

Perhaps the most practical change for military parents is the mandate that the Secretary of Defense must create a formal, clear process for parents or guardians to file a complaint if they suspect a violation. This means parents now have a direct line to the DoD to report perceived curriculum infractions. While this offers parents a voice, it also creates a system where curriculum choices and classroom discussions can be easily challenged and potentially penalized, creating a chilling effect where teachers may self-censor to avoid investigation and job loss.