PolicyBrief
H.R. 4998
119th CongressAug 19th 2025
Safeguarding the Use of the National Guard Act
IN COMMITTEE

The SUN Act mandates timely and detailed congressional reporting and oversight for the domestic deployment of National Guard and reserve forces by the President, excluding deployments solely for natural disaster relief.

Sam Liccardo
D

Sam Liccardo

Representative

CA-16

LEGISLATION

New SUN Act Demands Presidential Report Within 15 Days for Domestic National Guard Deployments

If you’ve paid attention to the news over the last few years, you’ve probably seen the National Guard deployed for everything from civil unrest to pandemic relief. The Safeguarding the Use of the National Guard Act (SUN Act), specifically Section 2, is designed to make sure that when the President uses these reserve forces—especially the National Guard—inside the U.S., Congress and the public know exactly why, how much it costs, and whether it actually worked. Think of it as installing a mandatory check-in system on the Executive Branch’s use of domestic military power.

The New 15-Day Clock on the White House

Under this bill, if the President deploys reserve forces domestically using authorities like Chapter 13 or 15 of Title 10 (which govern certain military actions) or any other law, they must send a detailed report to Congress within 15 days of the deployment starting. This report isn’t just a quick memo; it needs to lay out the exact legal basis for the deployment, the specific goals the President hopes to achieve, and the evidence used to justify the move. For people juggling work and family, this means more transparency about why armed personnel might be operating in their communities, and whether the decision was based on solid facts or just a hunch.

Following the Money and the Mission

Crucially, the report demands financial accountability. It requires a full breakdown of the total cost to the federal government, including the Department of Defense’s expenses and the hidden costs of pulling civilian staff to cover the Guard members’ regular jobs. This is key because domestic deployments are expensive, and those costs are ultimately borne by taxpayers. Furthermore, the report must include details on any clashes between service members and civilians, including reports from local police about whether the military’s presence was appropriate. This provision attempts to measure the real-world friction caused by using military forces in civilian environments.

Did It Even Work?

It’s one thing to send in the troops; it’s another to know if it helped. The SUN Act mandates a follow-up accountability measure: the Chief of the National Guard Bureau must brief Congress to explain whether the deployment actually reduced violence and achieved the goals the President set out. For the average person, this is the most important part—it moves beyond simply justifying the deployment to assessing its effectiveness. This ensures that domestic deployments aren't just a political show, but a verifiable tool used only when necessary and effective.

The Disaster Loophole

There is one major exception to all this reporting: the Disaster Exception. If the President deploys the National Guard solely because of a natural disaster or severe weather event under the Stafford Act (the main law governing federal disaster relief), they don't have to file the 15-day report. While this makes sense—we don't want bureaucracy slowing down hurricane response—it does create a bit of a gray area. If a situation involves both a disaster and civil unrest, the administration might be able to classify the deployment under the Stafford Act to skip the reporting requirements, potentially reducing accountability when tensions are highest. For those of us who appreciate clear rules, this medium level of vagueness around the exception is something to watch.