This bill establishes federal crimes for transporting minors across state lines to circumvent parental involvement laws for abortions and mandates specific parental notification procedures for out-of-state abortions performed on minors.
David Taylor
Representative
OH-2
The Child Interstate Abortion Notification Act establishes federal crimes for knowingly transporting a minor across state lines to circumvent her home state's parental involvement laws for an abortion. It also mandates that physicians performing out-of-state abortions on minors must provide at least 24 hours of actual or constructive notice to a parent, unless specific exceptions apply. The law protects the minor and her parents from prosecution under the transportation provision and includes civil remedies for parents harmed by violations.
This legislation, the Child Interstate Abortion Notification Act, creates two new federal crimes centered on minors crossing state lines to obtain an abortion. The core idea is to extend the reach of state parental consent and notification laws across state borders, using federal law to enforce them. It focuses on anyone who helps a minor travel to a different state to bypass their home state’s requirements for parental involvement before an abortion.
Section 2 makes it a federal offense—punishable by fines or up to one year in prison—to knowingly transport a minor across state lines if the purpose is to circumvent the parental consent, notification, or judicial authorization rules of the minor’s home state. Think of it this way: If a state requires a parent to sign off on a minor’s abortion, and a relative or friend drives that minor to a neighboring state where no such parental sign-off is required, that driver could face federal charges. The bill specifically protects the minor and her parents from being charged under this transportation crime. There is an exception if the abortion is necessary to save the minor’s life. Interestingly, the bill also creates a separate, specific crime for anyone who commits incest with the minor and then transports her for an abortion, regardless of the parental consent laws in the destination state.
Section 3 targets the medical side of the equation by imposing strict notification requirements on physicians. If a doctor performs an abortion on a minor who lives in a different state, they must provide at least 24 hours’ actual notice (in-person written notice) to a parent before the procedure. If they can’t reach a parent directly, they must use constructive notice—sending certified mail, return receipt requested, which is considered delivered 48 hours after the next mail delivery day. Violating this rule is also punishable by fines or up to one year in prison.
This mandatory 24-hour notification is waived only in very specific cases: if the doctor follows the rules of the minor’s home state, if a court has already waived the requirement, if the minor alleges abuse (but then the doctor must report the abuse to authorities), or in a life-saving emergency (in which case the doctor must still notify the parent within 24 hours after the procedure). The parent can also sue the doctor for civil damages if these notification rules are violated, unless the parent committed incest with the minor.
This bill creates significant hurdles for minors seeking confidential medical care, especially those who might be facing dangerous situations at home. For the friend, relative, or advocate who helps a minor travel a few hours to seek care in a different state, what was previously a private family matter now carries the risk of federal criminal prosecution. This provision effectively chills the ability of minors in restrictive states to travel freely to access legal medical services.
For physicians, the notification requirements are a major administrative burden. The need to provide “actual notice” or navigate the complex timing of “constructive notice” (which involves calculating mail delivery schedules) introduces delays into the medical process. This could force a minor to wait several days before receiving care, even if the procedure is time-sensitive. Furthermore, it places the doctor in the position of having to report suspected abuse to authorities before providing the abortion, potentially putting the minor at greater risk if the authorities are slow to act or if the minor must return home in the interim. This legislation effectively uses federal law to enforce state-level parental involvement laws, making interstate travel for this specific medical procedure a legally risky endeavor for anyone involved other than the minor herself.