This Act establishes new federal grants to help public wastewater treatment plants upgrade their systems to treat or eliminate emerging contaminants like PFAS.
Hillary Scholten
Representative
MI-3
The Public Utility Remediation and Enhancement for Water Act establishes a new federal grant program administered by the EPA to help public wastewater treatment plants upgrade facilities. These grants specifically target the planning, design, and construction needed to treat or eliminate emerging contaminants like PFAS chemicals. The federal government will cover at least 75% of eligible project costs to improve water quality.
The new Public Utility Remediation and Enhancement for Water Act is aiming directly at one of the biggest headaches facing water utilities and public health today: emerging contaminants like PFAS, often called “forever chemicals.” Essentially, this bill creates a brand-new, dedicated grant program within the EPA to help public wastewater treatment plants clean up their act.
Starting in Fiscal Year 2026 and running through 2028, the bill authorizes $200 million annually for the EPA Administrator to hand out these grants (Sec. 2). Who gets the money? Public wastewater treatment plants that need to plan, design, or build upgrades specifically to stop, limit, or treat the discharge of PFAS or any other contaminant the Administrator deems “emerging.” This is a huge deal because these upgrades are often wildly expensive, and local communities usually bear the brunt of the cost.
Here’s the kicker that matters for your tax dollars and water rates: The federal government will cover at least 75% of the total estimated cost of the project. That means a $10 million upgrade only costs the local utility $2.5 million, max. For a town struggling to keep up with aging infrastructure, this 75% federal share is a massive relief. The bill also makes it flexible for the utility to find the remaining 25%, allowing them to use everything from public funds to money borrowed from State revolving funds—even if those funds have other rules. This flexibility is designed to get these projects moving faster.
The bill specifically targets PFAS, which are known to be persistent and linked to health issues. However, the EPA Administrator is also given the power to identify any other “emerging contaminant” that needs attention. While this keeps the program nimble and ready for the next environmental challenge, it’s also where the rules get a little fuzzy. The Administrator has broad authority here, and how they define and prioritize these future contaminants could shift the focus of the funding. This level of administrative discretion is something to watch, as it dictates where the $200 million annual budget ultimately goes.
For most people, the immediate impact is simple: cleaner water, eventually. If you live in an area where your utility is struggling to meet new, stricter standards for PFAS—and many are—this funding is the lifeline they need to afford the necessary technology. For example, a municipality that has been putting off a crucial filtration system upgrade due to cost might now be able to greenlight it, significantly reducing the harmful chemicals entering the local water supply.
However, even with the 75% federal coverage, local utilities and ratepayers are still on the hook for the remaining 25%. For smaller, less wealthy municipalities, even a quarter of a multi-million-dollar project can be a significant financial burden that translates into higher water bills. Furthermore, the bill allows the Administrator to waive some of the standard procedural rules that apply to federal water projects (Title VI rules), which, while potentially speeding up construction, could also reduce some of the oversight on how these projects are carried out—though critical rules related to prevailing wages and audit requirements remain protected (Sec. 513 and Sec. 608).
Overall, this bill is a targeted investment in public health infrastructure, providing much-needed financial muscle to tackle widespread water contamination issues that have been growing for years. It’s a clear benefit for communities struggling with these costs, even if the definition of what they’re fighting remains a moving target.