PolicyBrief
H.R. 4882
119th CongressAug 5th 2025
Gun Safety Board and Research Act
IN COMMITTEE

This Act establishes the Gun Safety Board to fund research, educate the public, and issue science-based recommendations for reducing gun violence across various contexts.

Mark DeSaulnier
D

Mark DeSaulnier

Representative

CA-10

LEGISLATION

New Federal Board Gets $25M Annually to Fund Scientific Research on Reducing Gun Violence

The “Gun Safety Board and Research Act” sets up a new federal entity called the Gun Safety Board within the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). Think of this Board as a dedicated, federally funded research lab and advisory committee focused specifically on finding out what actually works to reduce gun violence. This isn't just about talk; the Board has to be established within one year and its main job is to put money toward new, original research.

The Research Pipeline: Who Gets the Money?

If you’ve ever wondered why policy debates often lack hard data, this bill tries to fix that. The Board is required to start a grant program within two years, and here’s the key financial detail: at least half of the money appropriated by this Act must go directly toward these grants for original research. The funding starts small—$5 million authorized for each of the first two years—but then jumps to a substantial $25 million per year afterward. Crucially, the bill specifies that this new money can’t replace existing federal funding for gun violence research, meaning it’s a net increase in resources.

The research agenda is broad, covering everything from the effectiveness of current state and federal laws to the specific impacts of gun violence on things like healthcare costs, chronic community violence, police violence, and even accidental shootings. For someone working in healthcare, this means we might finally get solid data on the true financial burden of gun injuries. For local governments, the research should provide evidence-based methods for tackling issues like straw purchasing and gun trafficking (SEC. 2).

The Board: A Mix of Experts and Real-World Experience

Who gets to decide where this money goes and what research gets prioritized? The HHS Secretary appoints 22 members to the Board, and the composition is intentionally diverse. It includes the usual policy experts like those in public health, mental health, and law enforcement, but also brings in trauma surgeons and representatives from key federal agencies like the CDC and the ATF.

What makes this composition interesting is the inclusion of two members representing victims of gun violence, ensuring lived experience is at the table, and members with backgrounds in manufacturing, selling, or using firearms. This structure suggests an attempt to incorporate viewpoints from all sides of the issue when developing policy recommendations. They have to meet monthly and publish their findings and policy recommendations for governments at least once a year, essentially creating an annual, science-backed playbook for reducing violence.

What This Means for You

For the average person, this bill doesn't change any laws about gun ownership or sales right now. What it does is establish the mechanism to generate the data that future laws will theoretically be based on. If you’re a local policymaker, you stand to gain access to evidence-based recommendations instead of relying on guesswork. If you’re a taxpayer, you’re funding a dedicated effort to move the gun violence conversation from opinion to scientific fact, with a significant portion of the money dedicated to grants for new research.

While the Board’s composition is designed to be balanced, the Secretary of HHS has the sole authority to appoint all 22 members, which means the initial direction of the Board will heavily rely on those early appointments. However, the mandate is clear: use the authorized $25 million annually (after the first two years) to find out what works, who is affected, and how to make communities safer, relying on science rather than political rhetoric.