This Act authorizes the planning and design of infrastructure improvements for the Tye and Arnold Gates at Dyess Air Force Base using existing military construction planning funds.
Jodey Arrington
Representative
TX-19
This Act authorizes the planning and design of infrastructure improvements for the Tye Gate and Arnold Gate at Dyess Air Force Base in Texas. The legislation sets cost ceilings for each project and specifies that existing military construction planning funds must be used for these design activities. The design requirements emphasize efficiency, utility management, and traffic coordination for both gate modernization efforts.
The Dyess Air Base Access Infrastructure Design Act is a highly specific piece of legislation focused entirely on upgrading the access points at Dyess Air Force Base in Abilene, Texas. Simply put, this bill tells the Secretary of the Air Force to get the ball rolling on planning and designing two major infrastructure projects for the base’s gates.
This isn't about immediate construction; it’s about the blueprint stage. The bill mandates planning and design for two specific gates, each with a defined maximum budget for the final build. The Tye Gate project is capped at $17 million total, and the design work itself can’t exceed seven percent of that figure. The design brief for Tye Gate is straightforward: use standard Air Force gate designs and keep the utilities simple. The second project is the Arnold Gate, which has a slightly lower total project cap of $12,065,000, with design costs capped at eight percent. Because the Arnold Gate area is likely more complex—think more traffic, more existing infrastructure—the design must specifically account for site congestion, utility connections, coordinating traffic flow, and the ability to build the project in phases.
Here’s the part that matters for the federal budget: the Air Force isn't getting a fresh check for this planning stage. Section 2 explicitly states that the planning and design costs must be covered using money already set aside for military construction planning. For the average taxpayer, this means the government is repurposing existing funds, not asking for a new appropriation just for these two initial design phases. It’s a classic move of prioritizing specific projects within an existing budget line.
While this bill is hyper-local to Dyess AFB, it has implications for the military personnel and the local community. For the Air Force, these upgrades mean better security and smoother operations at two critical access points. For the engineers and contractors, it means millions of dollars in guaranteed planning and design contracts. For the folks who live and work around the base—the delivery drivers, the base employees, the families—it could eventually mean less traffic congestion and a more efficient commute once the construction is complete. The emphasis on managing traffic flow and building in phases (specifically at the Arnold Gate) shows the designers are being forced to think about minimizing disruption to daily life. However, by earmarking existing funds for these plans, the Air Force is potentially reducing the pool of money available for planning other military construction projects elsewhere. It’s a zero-sum game for the planning budget, ensuring these two projects get priority now.