The College Transparency Act establishes a secure, centralized system for tracking student data across postsecondary institutions to increase transparency regarding costs, completion, and post-college outcomes.
Raja Krishnamoorthi
Representative
IL-8
The College Transparency Act establishes a secure, new national system for tracking student data from postsecondary institutions to improve transparency regarding enrollment, completion, costs, and post-college outcomes. This system will collect detailed, student-level data, securely matched with other federal records, to create public, aggregate reports for comparison. The law mandates strict privacy and security standards while aiming to reduce overall reporting burdens for colleges.
The College Transparency Act sets up a massive new federal system designed to track students from the moment they enroll in college until well after they graduate. Managed by the National Center for Education Statistics (NCES), this “postsecondary student data system” must be operational within four years of the Act’s passage and aims to replace piecemeal reporting with a single, secure source of truth about higher education.
At its core, this bill is about making college outcomes transparent. It requires the NCES Commissioner to collect student-level data—not just institutional averages—on enrollment, retention, transfer rates, completion, costs, and financial aid. This data will be broken down by key demographics like age, race, gender, program of study, and whether a student received Pell Grants or veteran benefits (Sec. 2). The goal is to give prospective students and families the ability to compare, say, the electrical engineering program at State U versus Community College Tech, based on real-world success metrics rather than just marketing brochures.
Crucially, the system will securely match student data with federal agencies like the IRS/Treasury and the Social Security Administration to calculate long-term outcomes, specifically employment rates and student earnings. Think of it as a detailed, anonymized look at whether that expensive degree actually pays off in the job market. This data matching must happen periodically, not continuously, and students have the right to know what data is being matched (Sec. 2).
The biggest concern with any centralized database is privacy, and the bill tackles this head-on with some very specific rules. First, the system must adhere to strict data minimization principles, meaning they can only collect the absolute minimum data needed for the system’s goals. Second, the bill explicitly prohibits collecting highly sensitive data like individual health records, student discipline records, course grades, standardized test scores, citizenship status, political affiliation, or religion (Sec. 2). If you’re worried about the government knowing your GPA, don’t be—it’s specifically excluded.
Furthermore, the bill includes strong firewalls against misuse. The data cannot be used for law enforcement, debt collection, or immigration enforcement that could lead to an adverse action against a student. It also prohibits the federal government from using this data to create a college ranking system, which is a big deal for institutions. Any federal employee who willfully leaks personally identifiable data faces penalties and will be fired upon conviction (Sec. 2).
For colleges, especially those participating in federal student aid (Title IV) programs, this means mandatory new reporting requirements. While the requirement doesn't kick in for four years, institutions will eventually have to submit specific student-level data to the NCES. The hope is that this new system will eventually reduce the current administrative burden by consolidating the data schools currently report to the Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS) and other federal surveys (Sec. 5).
For the average person shopping for a college, the biggest win is the mandated public website. This user-friendly tool will allow anyone to filter and compare institutions and programs based on measurable outcomes: how many students complete the degree, how much debt they carry, and what they are earning five or ten years later. This is a huge step toward making higher education a transparent consumer decision (Sec. 2).
However, it's worth noting that creating a system this complex is a massive undertaking. The Commissioner has four years to build it, set the final data elements, and create the secure infrastructure, relying on a diverse Advisory Committee for guidance. While the bill’s privacy safeguards are robust, the sheer size of the new database means institutions will face a steep learning curve in compliance, and students will have to accept that their educational and early career paths are now being tracked by the federal government—albeit under strict, legally defined protections.