This Act promotes new bank formation by phasing in capital standards, adjusting business plan review timelines, offering temporary leverage ratio relief for rural institutions, expanding agricultural lending authority, and mandating a study on barriers to new bank creation.
Garland "Andy" Barr
Representative
KY-6
The Promoting New Bank Formation Act aims to encourage the creation of new banks by providing regulatory relief for newly insured institutions. This includes a three-year phase-in period for new capital standards and streamlined processes for adjusting initial business plans. The Act also establishes temporary, favorable capital requirements for new rural depository institutions and expands lending authority for Federal savings associations to include agricultural loans. Finally, it mandates a study on barriers to new bank formation, especially in underserved areas.
The Promoting New Bank Formation Act is designed to kickstart the creation of new banks, or what the industry calls de novo institutions. The core idea is to lower the regulatory hurdles for financial startups, especially around capital requirements and business planning, for the first few years of their existence. This bill is less about changing how you bank today and more about changing who might be offering you a loan tomorrow, particularly in areas that feel like banking deserts.
If a bank or its parent company is newly insured by the federal government—meaning they’ve just opened their doors—Section 2 grants them a three-year phase-in period to meet any new federal capital standards. Think of capital standards as the financial buffer banks must keep on hand to survive a crisis. For a new bank, meeting these requirements immediately can be a massive lift. This provision essentially gives them time to grow into the rules. The clock starts ticking the day they get insured. While this helps new players get into the market faster, it’s worth noting that for those three years, the new institution is operating with potentially less of a financial cushion than its established competitors. This is one of those trade-offs between promoting growth and maintaining immediate stability.
Section 3 introduces a major change to the bureaucratic dance of starting a bank. New banks often have to get their business plans approved by the federal banking agency. Under this Act, for the first three years, if a new bank wants to change its approved business plan, the agency has exactly 30 days to approve, approve with conditions, or deny the request. Here’s the kicker: If the agency stays silent for 30 days, the request is automatically approved. This is a huge win for speed and efficiency, cutting down on regulatory lag time. However, it also means that potentially significant strategic shifts—like changing a focus from community lending to riskier commercial real estate—could happen without proper regulatory vetting if the agencies miss the deadline. For the public, this is where the risk lies: reduced oversight in the crucial, early years of a bank’s life.
Two provisions offer targeted relief for smaller institutions. First, Section 4 creates a special, temporary capital requirement for new Rural Depository Institutions (defined as banks with less than $10 billion in assets located in a rural area). For their first three years, they only need to meet an 8 percent Community Bank Leverage Ratio (CBLR), with an even easier glide path during the first two years. This is designed to make it much easier for small, local banks to launch in underserved areas. If you live in a rural community where the nearest bank branch closed five years ago, this provision is designed to encourage a new one to open.
Second, Section 5 expands the lending menu for Federal savings associations (a type of federally chartered bank). Previously, their lending was highly restricted, often focused on housing. Now, they are explicitly allowed to make loans for agricultural purposes—everything from buying farm equipment to funding crop operations. This is a practical move that could significantly increase the available credit options for farmers and ranchers, especially where traditional community banks might be scarce.
Finally, Section 6 requires federal banking agencies to conduct a study on why so few new banks have opened in the last decade. More importantly, they must figure out practical ways to encourage new banks to set up shop in underserved areas, often called "banking deserts." They have one year to deliver this report to Congress. This acknowledges the reality that many communities lack adequate access to banking services and attempts to move beyond simply identifying the problem to proposing actual solutions.