PolicyBrief
H.R. 4734
119th CongressJul 23rd 2025
Hands Off Our Social Security Act
IN COMMITTEE

The Hands Off Our Social Security Act prohibits unauthorized tampering with benefits, data mining, privatization, workforce reductions, and office closures without explicit Congressional approval.

Melanie Stansbury
D

Melanie Stansbury

Representative

NM-1

LEGISLATION

Hands Off Our Social Security Act Locks Down Benefits, Bans Office Closures Without Congressional OK

This bill, simply titled the “Hands Off Our Social Security Act,” is all about putting up concrete walls around the Social Security Administration (SSA) to protect benefits, privacy, and service access. It’s essentially a comprehensive set of rules making it extremely difficult for the SSA to make major operational changes—like cutting staff, closing offices, or changing how benefits are paid—without getting explicit permission from Congress first. If you’re one of the millions relying on or paying into Social Security, this bill aims to make sure the system stays stable, public, and accessible.

Your Check is Safe: No Tampering Allowed

Section 3 makes it crystal clear: nobody working for the government, whether a federal employee or a contractor, can change, slow down, or hold back your Social Security payments unless an existing law already permits it. This is a huge guardrail. If anyone wants to modify how benefits are calculated or paid out—even minor adjustments—they need a brand new Act of Congress to do it. For the everyday person, this means your benefit check is protected from administrative overreach or sudden, unauthorized changes driven by internal agency decisions. You won't wake up to a surprise change in your payment timing unless Congress specifically voted on it.

Keeping Your Data Out of the Ad Pipeline

In the digital age, data privacy is a major concern, and Section 4 addresses it directly. This provision bans the SSA and its contractors from gathering, sharing, or using your personal Social Security data for anything other than running the Social Security programs themselves. Crucially, it specifically bans data mining and the use of your information for things like commercial advertising or political campaigning. Think of it this way: your sensitive financial and personal details won't be sold or repurposed to target you with ads or political messaging. The only reason they can touch your data is to make sure you get your benefits, and that’s it.

Service Stays Public and Local

Two key sections aim to prevent the kind of service cuts that hit people where they live. Section 5 prohibits the privatization or outsourcing of Social Security benefits and services. Your benefits won't be managed by a private corporation unless Congress passes a specific law allowing it. The SSA must remain a federal agency responsible for administration. This is a win for those who worry about essential services being run for profit.

Furthermore, Sections 6 and 7 tackle staffing and physical offices. The SSA cannot make unauthorized workforce reductions or close local field offices without Congressional consent. Section 7 requires the SSA to maintain a minimum number of fully working offices in every state, proportional to the population served. If you live in a rural area, this is important because it means the SSA can’t just decide to shut down the nearest office to save money. If they want to merge or close offices, they need an Act of Congress, and they first have to prove to Congress that service levels won't suffer.

The Trade-Off: Bureaucratic Roadblocks

While these protections are strong, they come with a potential bureaucratic cost. The bill’s insistence that almost any significant change—from closing an office to making minor staffing tweaks—requires a full Act of Congress (not just a committee vote or agency rule change) could slow down the SSA significantly. If the agency needs to make a necessary, non-controversial administrative adjustment to improve efficiency or adapt to new technology, the requirement for a new law could create major delays. This strict limitation on administrative discretion, while protective, might hinder the SSA’s ability to adapt quickly to the real-world needs of its beneficiaries. However, the bill does set up annual audits by the Government Accountability Office (GAO) to ensure the SSA is following all these new rules, which should keep them accountable to Congress and, by extension, the public.