The SHOW UP Act of 2025 mandates that executive agencies revert to pre-pandemic telework policies and requires rigorous certification before any future expansion of remote work.
James Comer
Representative
KY-1
The SHOW UP Act of 2025 requires executive agencies to revert their telework policies to pre-pandemic levels by December 31, 2019. Any future expansion of telework must be supported by a comprehensive impact study and certified by the Office of Personnel Management to ensure it improves mission performance and reduces agency costs.
The SHOW UP Act of 2025 is a legislative reset button for the federal workforce. Within 30 days of this bill becoming law, every executive agency must roll back their telework policies to exactly what they were on December 31, 2019 (Section 2). This means the hybrid and remote setups many federal employees have used for the last few years would vanish almost overnight, reverting to the stricter, in-office standards of the pre-pandemic era. The bill’s primary goal is to address concerns about government productivity and the high costs of maintaining empty office buildings while employees work from home.
Before any agency can think about expanding remote work again, they have to do their homework. Under Section 3, agency heads have six months to submit a deep-dive study to Congress. They need to look at whether remote work hurt customer service, how much they spent on underused real estate, and whether they were accidentally paying "locality pay" (higher wages meant for expensive cities) to people who had actually moved to cheaper areas. For a federal worker who moved to a rural town during the pandemic to save on rent, this study is the first step toward a potential pay cut or a mandatory move back to the city.
If an agency wants to keep its remote options, it faces a tough certification process. The Director of the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) must personally certify that any telework plan will "substantially improve" mission performance and "substantially lower" costs for real estate and locality pay (Section 3). This isn't just a suggestion; it’s a strict requirement. For the average citizen waiting on a passport or a tax refund, the bill bets that having staff back in the office will speed things up. However, the term "substantially" is a bit of a gray area—it’s not defined by a specific percentage, which could lead to long bureaucratic delays while agencies and the OPM argue over the math.
This shift hits different people in different ways. For a manager at a federal agency, this could mean a sudden logistical headache of reorganizing office space and managing a workforce that might be unhappy about losing their flexible schedules. For local businesses in downtown D.C. or other federal hubs, more feet on the street could mean a boost in lunch-hour sales. On the flip side, the bill’s focus on cutting costs could lead to a talent drain; if a specialized software coder for the government can find a fully remote job in the private sector, they might jump ship rather than return to a 2019-style commute. The bill explicitly aims to ensure teleworkers have the right secure tools and data access, but it requires that these upgrades don't "substantially increase" the agency's overall costs, which might be a difficult needle to thread.