PolicyBrief
H.R. 4710
119th CongressJul 23rd 2025
No Surprises Act Enforcement Act
IN COMMITTEE

This Act increases penalties for health plans and insurers that violate surprise billing rules, imposes severe financial penalties for late payments after dispute resolution, and mandates more frequent and detailed transparency reporting on enforcement actions.

Gregory Murphy
R

Gregory Murphy

Representative

NC-3

LEGISLATION

No Surprises Act Gets Triple-Penalty Upgrade: Insurers Face $10K Fines for Balance Billing Violations

If you’ve ever been hit with a surprise medical bill—that nasty “balance bill” that shows up months later after your insurer and the provider finish their fight—you know how frustrating the existing system can be. The No Surprises Act Enforcement Act is essentially a massive upgrade to the original law, making sure the people who violate the rules actually feel the pain.

This bill doesn't change what is illegal; it changes how much it costs to break the law. It dramatically ramps up the financial consequences for group health plans, insurance issuers, and even out-of-network providers who try to sidestep the protections against surprise billing. Think of it as putting rocket boosters on the enforcement arm of the federal government.

The New Cost of Non-Compliance: $10,000 Per Person

One of the biggest changes is the penalty structure for insurers and health plans. Currently, if a plan messes up rules related to surprise billing disclosures or payment disputes, the fines can be pretty low on a per-day basis. This new Act introduces a serious deterrent: the government can now hit a plan or issuer with a civil penalty of up to $10,000 for each individual affected by certain serious violations. This applies specifically if they fail to follow rules around required notices and disclosures designed to protect consumers (Section 2).

What does this mean for you? If your large employer's health plan or your insurance company tries to dodge their responsibility under the No Surprises Act, the financial risk just went through the roof. For an insurer covering 50,000 people, a systemic failure to send the right notices could suddenly turn into a potential $500 million fine, making compliance a mandatory business decision rather than an optional one. This provision applies across all major federal health laws (PHSA, ERISA, and IRC), ensuring no plan is exempt from this new level of scrutiny.

Pay on Time, or Pay Triple

The second major hammer this bill drops is aimed at anyone who drags their feet after an Independent Dispute Resolution (IDR) entity makes a final payment determination. The IDR process is how providers and insurers settle on a fair price for an out-of-network service without involving the patient.

Under Section 3, once the IDR entity decides who owes whom, the payment must be made within 30 days. If the plan or the provider misses that deadline, they face a staggering penalty: they must pay the other party an amount that is three times the difference between the initial payment made and the final rate determined by the IDR process, plus interest. This applies to both standard care and air ambulance services.

For example, say a hospital bills $50,000, the insurer initially pays $10,000, and the IDR determines the fair rate is $20,000. If the insurer misses the 30-day window to pay the remaining $10,000, they don't just owe the $10,000; they owe the provider an additional penalty of $30,000 (three times the $10,000 difference), plus interest. This is a huge win for providers who rely on timely payments, and it ensures that the IDR process actually leads to quick resolution, not just another bureaucratic delay.

Transparency Is Now Semi-Annual

Finally, the Act mandates a major increase in transparency regarding enforcement. Currently, federal agencies report annually on their audits of health plans. Under Section 4, once this bill passes, the Secretary must provide detailed reports to Congress every six months.

These new reports must include the total number of audits conducted, the number of consumer complaints received, the total dollar amount of penalties issued, and—most importantly—a summary of the three most common violations found during that period. This means we, the public, will get a much clearer, more frequent picture of who is breaking the rules and how often. This increased light on enforcement actions should help keep plans and providers honest, as their failures will be documented and reported twice as often.