PolicyBrief
H.R. 4704
119th CongressJul 23rd 2025
Rotary-wing Operator Toxic Occupational Research Act
IN COMMITTEE

This bill mandates a comprehensive study to investigate potential links between military rotary-wing operations and increased cancer prevalence or mortality among pilots and support personnel.

Rich McCormick
R

Rich McCormick

Representative

GA-7

LEGISLATION

ROTOR Act Mandates One-Year Study on Cancer Rates Among Military Helicopter Crews Since 1961

The newly proposed Rotary-wing Operator Toxic Occupational Research Act (ROTOR Act) is a straightforward piece of legislation aimed at answering a critical question for thousands of military personnel: Are helicopter pilots and support crews getting cancer at higher rates than the general population, and if so, why?

This bill doesn't create new benefits yet; it mandates a two-phase, high-stakes health study. The Defense Health Agency (DHA), working with the NIH and the National Cancer Institute (NCI), has to immediately start digging into the data. This is about finally getting solid answers for the people who have been operating and maintaining military helicopters for decades.

The Health Check: Phase One Starts Now

Think of Phase One as a critical audit of health records. The DHA Director must determine, within one year, if "covered individuals"—anyone who served as a rotary-wing crew member since February 28, 1961, and who currently receives specific military health benefits—have higher rates of getting or dying from a list of twelve specific cancers compared to the general population. The list is extensive, covering everything from brain and lung cancer to melanoma and testicular cancer (SEC. 2. Phase One).

If you were a crew chief, a pilot, or support personnel on a Black Hawk, Apache, or Chinook, this study is looking at your health history. The bill requires the DHA to use existing data, including information from the NCI’s standardized SEER program, to ensure the findings are scientifically sound. This standardized approach is key because it makes the data comparable across different studies, cutting down on the "apples and oranges" problem that often plagues military health research.

If Rates Are High: The Search for Causes in Phase Two

If Phase One confirms that cancer rates are elevated for this group, the bill immediately triggers a second, deeper investigation. This is where the real detective work begins. Phase Two focuses on identifying the specific causes behind the increased rates, and the DHA has another year to report these findings to Congress. (SEC. 2. Phase Two).

This second phase specifically targets occupational hazards. Are the fumes, fuels, and hydraulic fluids associated with helicopter operations the culprit? Is it the non-ionizing radiation from radars and other equipment in the cockpit and on the flight line? Or is it something else entirely, perhaps related to where these service members were deployed or their other duties? This part of the study is a direct response to long-standing concerns that the unique environment of military aviation might be inherently toxic.

What This Means for the People Who Flew

For the thousands of veterans who have served in these roles, the ROTOR Act is a crucial step toward accountability and potential relief. If the study confirms a link between their service and higher cancer risk, it provides the necessary evidence for Congress and the VA to establish presumptive conditions for compensation and care. It validates decades of anecdotal reports and personal health struggles. The bill also requires all data to be broken down by race, gender, and age, ensuring that the research captures potential disparities within the covered population, which is vital for equitable health policy.

One potential challenge lies in the definition of a "covered individual," which is limited to those currently receiving specific health care benefits under Chapter 55 of Title 10, U.S. Code. This means some personnel who served but may not qualify for those specific benefits might be inadvertently excluded from the primary study group, potentially leaving gaps in the data. Nevertheless, the ROTOR Act represents a focused, data-driven approach to addressing a serious occupational health concern, prioritizing fact-finding over speculation to protect those who served.