This Act mandates the National Fire Academy Administrator to submit an annual report to Congress detailing course attendance, firefighter demographics, program statistics, and funding allocations.
April McClain Delaney
Representative
MD-6
This bill, the National Fire Academy Reporting Act, mandates that the Administrator of the National Academy for Fire Prevention and Control submit an annual report to Congress. This report must detail the courses and programs offered, including attendance breakdowns by department type and firefighter status. It also requires specific reporting on course cancellations and the allocation of financial assistance and student aid.
This legislation, the National Fire Academy Reporting Act, is all about transparency and paperwork. It mandates that the Administrator of the National Academy for Fire Prevention and Control must start sending a detailed annual report to Congress. Think of it as a detailed performance review, due every November 30th, starting the first full year after the Act passes.
For anyone in the fire service, this report is going to shine a spotlight on who is actually using the federal training resources. The bill requires the Academy to detail exactly how many fire departments—and which state they are in—sent staff to their courses. More importantly, it requires a clear split of attendees: how many were career firefighters and how many were volunteer firefighters. This kind of data is gold for understanding who is accessing federal training, especially as volunteer departments often face different challenges than their career counterparts.
If you’re tracking how federal dollars are spent on local services, this bill provides a clearer map. The report must detail the total funding distributed, specifically breaking out amounts given to state fire service training programs versus local fire service training programs. This distinction matters because it shows whether federal money is flowing directly to local departments or being filtered through state-level agencies first. It also requires the total amount of direct student aid awarded to those attending the Academy’s programs to be listed, offering a clear picture of financial support for individual attendees.
While this is great news for congressional oversight—they get the hard data to make informed decisions about funding and program reach—it means a significant amount of new administrative work for the Academy staff. They now have to track, compile, and verify all this detailed information annually. They also have to report on the total number of courses offered versus the total number of courses that were canceled. This metric could be used to evaluate efficiency and demand, but for the staff, it’s just another set of numbers they have to meticulously track and explain every year. Ultimately, this bill doesn't change what the Academy does, but it fundamentally changes how they have to account for it.