The MAMDANI Act directs the FTC to study the competitive and economic impacts of government-owned grocery stores on the private food retail market.
Michael Lawler
Representative
NY-17
The MAMDANI Act mandates that the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), in collaboration with the USDA, conduct a comprehensive study on the potential market impacts of government-owned grocery stores. This study will analyze how public grocery operations affect competition, consumer choice, farmers, and the overall fairness of the retail food sector. The FTC is required to report its findings and recommendations to Congress one year after the study is complete, followed by annual updates.
The Measuring Adverse Market Disruption And National Impact Act—or the MAMDANI Act for short—is not about building grocery stores; it’s about putting the brakes on and studying what happens when local governments try to run them. This bill mandates that the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) conduct a detailed, multi-agency study on the potential real-world effects of government-owned grocery stores on the market.
This isn't just an academic exercise. With local governments increasingly considering public grocery stores as a way to tackle food deserts and high prices, Congress wants the FTC to figure out the competitive fallout. The study, which the FTC must kick off within 180 days, is required to look at how public stores impact private grocery stores (from the corner market to the big chains), farmers, and charities like food banks. It’s a deep dive into the supply chain, market share, and distribution networks, essentially asking: Will this help or hurt the food ecosystem we already have?
For the average person, the most important part of this study is what it will reveal about consumer impact. The FTC must analyze how public stores affect what people pay, the variety of products available, and whether food access genuinely improves, especially in those "food deserts"—areas where poverty is high and the nearest large supermarket is over a mile away. If you live in an underserved neighborhood, the findings could directly influence whether a public option ever lands near you.
Crucially, the bill focuses heavily on fairness. The FTC is tasked with finding out if public grocery stores get an unfair leg up—think special subsidies, tax breaks, or regulatory perks—that private businesses don't receive. For the small business owner running a local market, this is the core concern: will they be forced to compete with a government entity that doesn't have to play by the same rules? The study also needs to project the long-term viability of the retail sector if government entities start competing directly.
This isn't a one-and-done deal. The FTC has to submit its first report to Congress within one year of finishing the study, and then follow up with annual updates. These reports won't just be data dumps; they must include specific recommendations for new laws or administrative actions based on the findings. In short, this study is designed to give Congress the ammunition—or the caution—it needs to set policy regarding public grocery initiatives nationwide. For local governments currently exploring this route, the results of this federal analysis could very well shape their future regulatory landscape.