This bill restricts the use of federal law enforcement and military personnel for domestic crowd control, mandates clear identification, limits operations to federal property unless requested by state and local officials, and requires public reporting of deployments.
Suzanne Bonamici
Representative
OR-1
The Preventing Authoritarian Policing Tactics on America’s Streets Act establishes strict limitations on the deployment of federal law enforcement and military personnel for domestic crowd control. This bill mandates that all federal personnel involved in such situations must clearly display identifying information, such as their name and agency. Furthermore, it generally restricts their operations to federal property unless specific state and local requests are made or the Insurrection Act is invoked. Agencies must also publicly report details of any deployment within 24 hours.
This legislation, titled the Preventing Authoritarian Policing Tactics on America’s Streets Act, puts significant new limits on when and how federal law enforcement and military personnel can get involved in domestic crowd control, riots, or protest-related arrests. The core idea is simple: if federal officers are going to interact with the public during a demonstration, they need to be clearly identifiable, operate within specific boundaries, and the public needs to know what they are doing.
For anyone who remembers seeing unidentified agents during past protests, this section is key. The bill mandates that any federal law enforcement officer, contractor, or military member engaged in crowd control or protest arrests must clearly display their federal agency name and their last name or a unique ID number at all times. Military members also need to show their rank. Crucially, they are explicitly forbidden from covering up or hiding this required identification while on duty in these situations (SEC. 2(b)). Think of it as a mandatory name tag, but one you can’t tape over.
This identification requirement is coupled with a rule about transportation: if federal personnel are arresting or detaining civilians during a public event, they cannot use unmarked vehicles for those actions. They must use marked vehicles (SEC. 2(c)(2)). For the average person, this means if you see an arrest happening at a protest, you should be able to immediately identify the agency involved and the individual making the arrest, which is a massive step toward accountability.
Perhaps the biggest change is the restriction on where federal forces can operate. Generally, federal officers or military members can only step in for crowd control or protest arrests if the activity is happening on federal property or the public street and sidewalk immediately next to a federal building (SEC. 2(c)(1)). This means federal agents can’t just roll up to a city park demonstration or a state capitol protest unless it’s directly adjacent to federal land.
There are two exceptions to this location rule. Federal forces can operate off federal property if the Governor of the state and the head of the local government both send a joint, written request asking for federal assistance. The other exception is if the President invokes the Insurrection Act. This joint request requirement is a big deal, as it restores local control and prevents the federal government from unilaterally deploying forces onto local streets. However, the bill is slightly vague on the definition of "immediately next to" federal property, which could lead to disputes about operational boundaries.
This bill doesn't just set guidelines; it sets consequences. If a federal officer or service member violates the rules about displaying identification or operating outside the designated location boundaries, it becomes illegal for them to arrest anyone in the U.S. while they are in violation (SEC. 2(c)(3)). This is the accountability mechanism that matters most to civil liberties advocates—if you don't follow the rules, your authority to detain people is nullified.
Finally, transparency is mandated after the fact. Within 24 hours of any federal deployment for crowd control, the responsible agency has to post a public notice on its website. This notice must detail when the personnel were deployed, how many officers were acting in a law enforcement capacity, what the mission was, and, crucially, where any detained civilians are being held and who is in charge of them (SEC. 2(d)). This ensures that families and legal counsel aren't left guessing about the status of someone detained by federal agents during a protest.