This bill mandates the relocation of the Department of Energy's Office of Fossil Energy and Carbon Management from Washington, D.C., to Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, by the end of 2026.
Guy Reschenthaler
Representative
PA-14
This Act mandates the relocation of the Department of Energy's Office of Fossil Energy and Carbon Management from Washington, D.C., to Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, by the end of 2026. The Secretary of Energy must report to Congress afterward detailing employee turnover resulting from the move and plans to address resulting staff shortages.
The Office of Fossil Energy and Carbon Management Relocation Act of 2025 is a straightforward bill with a significant logistical and financial mandate. It requires the Secretary of Energy to move the Department of Energy’s Office of Fossil Energy and Carbon Management (FECM) from its current location in Washington, D.C., to Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. This move isn't optional; the bill sets a hard deadline of December 31, 2026, for the physical relocation, overriding standard federal rules that typically keep such offices in the capital.
This isn't just about changing the address on the letterhead. The FECM is a key office responsible for managing research and development related to fossil fuels and carbon capture technologies. Forcing this kind of move—a massive logistical undertaking—is going to generate some serious friction. While Pittsburgh stands to gain a federal office and the economic boost that comes with it, the cost to taxpayers will be substantial, covering everything from finding new office space to physically moving equipment and personnel. Think about moving your own life across state lines, then multiply that by hundreds of employees and specialized government equipment; that’s the scale of disruption we’re talking about.
One of the biggest real-world impacts of mandated relocation is employee turnover. When a federal agency moves, many specialized staff members—the engineers, scientists, and policy experts who actually run the programs—choose not to uproot their lives and families. This bill anticipates that problem by requiring the Secretary of Energy to report back to Congress one year after the move. That report must detail exactly how many employees quit because of the move and how the relocation impacted the staff's ability to negotiate working conditions with their representatives (SEC. 2). This mandatory reporting suggests a real concern that forcing the move could lead to a significant loss of institutional knowledge, potentially slowing down critical energy projects while the office struggles to rebuild its workforce in Pittsburgh.
For the people of Pittsburgh, this is a clear win. Bringing a federal office, and its associated jobs and spending power, into the city could be a nice economic boost. However, the immediate cost falls on the taxpayer, who funds the physical move and the inevitable operational slowdown. The biggest impact, though, falls squarely on the current FECM employees. For those who cannot or will not move, this bill effectively ends their employment with the office, forcing them to find new jobs or transfer within the D.O.E. if possible. The required report on turnover is a necessary piece of accountability, forcing the Department to put a number on the human cost of this mandated relocation.