The SNOW Act of 2025 amends the Stafford Act to provide more federal assistance for winter storm damage, especially in rural and disadvantaged areas, by allowing funds for snow removal equipment, defining winter storm conditions for disaster declarations, and increasing the federal cost share for disaster relief and debris removal.
Timothy Kennedy
Representative
NY-26
The SNOW Act of 2025 amends the Stafford Act to provide additional support for communities affected by winter storms. It allows funds to be used for snow removal equipment, defines winter storm conditions for disaster declarations, and directs FEMA to issue regulations for winter storm assistance. The bill also adjusts the federal cost share for disaster relief, increasing it to at least 75% and up to 90% for rural or disadvantaged areas.
The SNOW Act of 2025 significantly expands federal disaster relief for winter storms, changing how FEMA responds to and funds recovery from severe snow, ice, and wind chill events. The core purpose is to make it easier for states, especially those with rural and lower-income areas, to get federal help after major winter storms.
The bill amends the Stafford Act, the main law governing federal disaster response. It specifically adds "winter storms" – defined as heavy snow, blowing snow, or dangerous wind chills – to the list of events eligible for FEMA assistance. This means FEMA can now fund things like buying snow removal equipment before a storm hits, as a form of hazard mitigation (SEC. 2). It also spells out how FEMA should help with debris removal, road and bridge repairs, fixing public buildings, and restoring utilities after a winter storm (SEC. 2).
For example, imagine a small, rural town in upstate New York gets slammed by a blizzard, leaving roads impassable and power lines down. Under the old rules, getting federal aid was a complex process, often tied to statewide damage totals. Now, if that town's median household income is below the national average (as determined by the Census Bureau), and it's not in a major city, it could qualify for a faster disaster declaration, even if the rest of the state isn't as badly affected (SEC. 2). This could mean quicker access to funds for clearing roads, restoring power, and getting the town back on its feet. The same goes for a parish in Louisiana that might experience a rare, but crippling ice storm. The legislation creates a process for waiving the usual requirements for declaring a major disaster if certain criteria are met, such as the State's confirmation of damages exceeding the threshold, or National Weather Service reports of extreme conditions like wind speeds above 58 mph with sub-zero wind chills or lake-effect snow lasting over 24 hours (SEC. 2).
One of the biggest changes is how much the federal government will pay. Usually, FEMA covers at least 75% of eligible disaster relief costs. The SNOW Act bumps that up to at least 90% for "rural or disadvantaged areas" – places with below-average incomes or outside major urban centers (SEC. 3). This applies to debris removal, hazard mitigation, and other forms of assistance. This means less financial strain on local and state budgets, but it also puts more of the cost burden on federal taxpayers.
Consider a construction company hired to repair a damaged bridge in a rural county. Under the new law, FEMA could cover 90% of the repair costs, leaving the state or county to pay only 10%. While this helps local communities recover faster, it also raises questions about whether states might become overly reliant on federal aid, and if there are enough safeguards to prevent overspending or misuse of funds.
While the SNOW Act aims to streamline aid and prioritize vulnerable communities, there are potential challenges. The definition of "rural or disadvantaged area" relies on Census Bureau data on median household income and urban status, which, while generally reliable, could lead to debates about which areas qualify (SEC. 2 & 3). The waiver process for disaster declarations, while designed to speed things up, could also be open to interpretation, potentially leading to situations where federal aid is requested even when the damage isn't truly catastrophic. The bill also shifts a larger share of disaster costs to the federal government, which could incentivize states to rely more heavily on federal aid rather than investing in their own preparedness measures. Finally, while the bill requires FEMA to create regulations for providing winter storm assistance, the details of those regulations will be crucial in determining how effectively and fairly the aid is distributed (SEC. 2).