The Department of Education Protection Act prohibits the Department of Education from using appropriated funds to implement reorganization activities that would decentralize, reduce staffing, or change the responsibilities, structure, authority, or functionality of the Department as it was organized on January 1, 2025.
Jahana Hayes
Representative
CT-5
The "Department of Education Protection Act" prevents the Department of Education from using already allocated funds to reorganize in ways that would decentralize, reduce staff, or alter the Department's responsibilities, structure, authority, or functions as they existed on January 1, 2025. This act ensures that the Department of Education continues to focus on boosting student success and equal access through its established offices and institutes.
The Department of Education Protection Act essentially freezes the Department of Education (DoE) in its current state. The bill prohibits the DoE from using any funds from prior Appropriations Acts for the current fiscal year to make significant internal changes. Specifically, it blocks any reorganization that would decentralize operations, cut staff, or alter the responsibilities, structure, authority, or functionality of the Department as it existed on January 1, 2025 (SEC. 3). This means the organizational chart, who does what, and who reports to whom – all of that is locked in for now.
The core of this bill is about maintaining the DoE's existing structure. Congress, through this act, is asserting its authority over how the DoE operates, emphasizing that it has a major role in shaping federal agencies (SEC. 2). By freezing the Department's structure, the bill aims to ensure that the various offices within the DoE—like the Office of Elementary and Secondary Education, the Office of Postsecondary Education, and others listed in the Findings (SEC. 2)—continue to function as they have been.
Imagine a company where, midway through the year, management is told they can't shift teams around, change project leads, or even hire or fire anyone in specific departments. That’s essentially what this bill does to the DoE. For example, if the Office of Special Education Services wanted to create a new team focused on a specific learning disability, using funds already allocated, this bill would likely prevent that. Or, if the Department wanted to streamline operations by merging two smaller offices, that would also be off the table.
By blocking reorganization, the bill could prevent the DoE from adapting to new educational challenges or implementing potentially more efficient structures. It could be a roadblock, preventing necessary reforms. On the flip side, this freeze provides stability. Employees of the DoE, and the programs and organizations that rely on its current funding and structure, are protected from sudden shifts. It's a double-edged sword: while preventing potential disruptions, it also limits the Department's flexibility to evolve.