This Act mandates increased transparency, reporting, and accountability measures for the Small Business Administration's disaster loan programs.
Tim Moore
Representative
NC-14
The Disaster Loan Accountability and Reform Act (DLARA) aims to increase transparency and oversight of Small Business Administration (SBA) disaster loan programs. It mandates more frequent and detailed monthly reporting on loan funding and requires comprehensive budget disclosures from the President regarding loan costs. Furthermore, the bill directs the Government Accountability Office (GAO) to conduct reports analyzing loan disbursement rates and the impact of recent regulatory changes.
The Disaster Loan Accountability and Reform Act (DLARA) is designed to pull back the curtain on how the Small Business Administration (SBA) manages its disaster fund. It shifts the agency from occasional updates to a permanent, monthly reporting cycle and forces the President’s budget to break down exactly where disaster money is going—separating the actual loans from the administrative costs of running the office. Most importantly, it creates an early-warning system that triggers a 24-hour notice to Congress if the disaster fund drops below 10 percent of its 10-year average, ensuring the money doesn't run dry without a plan in place.
Under this bill, the SBA can no longer wait for a major disaster to talk about its finances. Section 4 mandates monthly reports that must include the exact date the agency expects to hit 10 percent of its funding and the date it will be completely broke. For a local hardware store owner or a family trying to rebuild after a hurricane, this means more predictability; the goal is to prevent those sudden 'out of funds' notices that can stall a recovery for months. To make sure the bosses at the SBA take this seriously, the bill includes a 'no report, no travel' rule: if the Administrator is late on a report, they lose their budget for official travel until the paperwork is turned in.
One of the biggest shifts in this legislation is how it handles the lingering effects of the pandemic. Section 5 requires the annual budget to specifically separate 'regular' disaster loans from the COVID-19 Economic Injury Disaster Loans (COVID-EIDL). By requiring a 10-year average comparison for every spending request, the bill makes it easier for everyone to see if the government is asking for a reasonable amount of money or if costs are spiraling. For the taxpayer, this is like checking the itemized receipt instead of just looking at the total at the bottom; it shows exactly how much it costs to manage the old COVID debt versus helping people with new disasters like fires or floods.
The bill also puts the Government Accountability Office (GAO) to work, requiring deep-dive reports into how fast money is actually getting into people's hands. Section 7 asks for the average weekly disbursement rates for the first 12 weeks after a loan is accepted, specifically comparing the pre-2023 era to the current one. This data is crucial for a contractor waiting on a business loan to buy materials or a homeowner waiting on funds to fix a roof. Additionally, the GAO must investigate recent rule changes—like higher loan limits and longer payment deferrals—to see if those tweaks are actually helping or just making the program more expensive to run (Section 8). This ensures that when the SBA changes the 'terms and conditions' of its loans, someone is checking to see if those changes actually work for the people they are meant to serve.