PolicyBrief
H.R. 4174
119th CongressJun 26th 2025
ATF DATA Act
IN COMMITTEE

The ATF DATA Act mandates the annual public release of detailed firearm trace data, focusing on dealer activity, high-crime area recovery, and trafficking patterns.

Dan Goldman
D

Dan Goldman

Representative

NY-10

LEGISLATION

ATF DATA Act Mandates Annual Public Release of Detailed Gun Trace Data, Naming Top 200 Dealers

The new ATF DATA Act (officially the ATF Data and Anti-Trafficking Accountability Act) is a big push for transparency, requiring the Attorney General—through the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF)—to publish a comprehensive annual report detailing firearm trace data. Within six months of enactment, and every year thereafter, this report must be made electronically available to the public, focusing on the flow of crime guns and trafficking patterns. This is essentially opening up the ATF’s data vault on how guns move from legal sale to criminal use, giving researchers and the public a deep dive into the mechanics of gun trafficking.

Opening the Books on Crime Guns

This bill doesn’t just ask for general numbers; it demands specifics. The annual report must identify the top 200 licensed dealers (known as “source licensees”) whose firearms were traced back to crimes the most often. For each of these dealers, the report must detail the number of handguns, rifles, and shotguns traced, the cities where they were recovered, and the crucial “time-to-crime”—the period between the gun’s first retail sale and when police requested the trace. This level of detail means that for the first time, the public will have a clear, granular view of which dealers are the primary sources of crime guns, even if those dealers followed the letter of the law in the initial sale.

Scrutiny on High-Crime Areas and Dealer Accountability

The legislation directs the ATF to focus its analysis on the 50 Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs) with the highest homicide rates. For these areas, the report must show where the guns came from (the top 10 source states) and who sold them (the top 20 source dealers). This geographic focus is meant to help law enforcement and policymakers pinpoint where trafficking is most active and how quickly legal sales turn into illegal possessions in specific high-crime zones, particularly tracking guns with a time-to-crime of less than one year.

Another major focus is dealer accountability regarding lost or stolen firearms. The report must track the percentage of lost or stolen guns that dealers failed to report as missing before police requested a trace. If a dealer has two or more lost or stolen firearms traced in the last five years, their reporting history for those incidents will be detailed. This provision directly addresses a major loophole: the failure to report missing inventory, which often fuels the illegal gun market. For licensed dealers, this means significantly increased public scrutiny on their inventory management and reporting compliance.

What This Means for Everyday People

For the average person, this bill translates complex federal data into actionable transparency. If you live in a city struggling with gun violence, this report will show you exactly where the guns recovered by police are coming from—whether they are flowing in from out-of-state dealers or being sourced locally. This data is critical for community leaders and law enforcement who are trying to disrupt trafficking supply chains. By making the data public, the bill empowers researchers and citizens to hold both the ATF and individual dealers accountable for their role in the legal-to-illegal firearm pipeline.

While the increased transparency is a clear benefit, there is a practical challenge for the identified dealers. Being named among the “top 200” dealers with the most traced guns, even if they committed no crime, could lead to public backlash or increased harassment. The trace data merely shows that a gun originated at that location; it doesn't prove the dealer acted improperly. However, the intent of the bill is clear: to prioritize the public safety need for information over the privacy concerns of businesses whose products are disproportionately found at crime scenes.