This Act establishes targeted U.S. sanctions against individuals undermining the Dayton Peace Agreement or threatening the security of Bosnia and Herzegovina, while codifying existing related sanctions and setting a seven-year expiration date for the new authorities.
Ann Wagner
Representative
MO-2
This Act establishes a policy to support the independence and stability of Bosnia and Herzegovina in accordance with the Dayton Peace Agreement. It mandates the imposition of targeted U.S. sanctions, including asset freezes and travel bans, against foreign persons who undermine the agreement or threaten the country's security and democratic institutions. The legislation also ensures the continuation of existing Western Balkans sanctions while providing a mechanism for Congress to request review of potential sanctions targets. This entire framework is set to expire seven years after enactment.
If you’ve ever had to deal with a messy international situation, you know stability is key. This bill, the “Upholding the Dayton Peace Agreement Through Sanctions Act,” is the U.S. government’s attempt to impose some stability on Bosnia and Herzegovina by hitting the people messing it up right where it hurts: their bank accounts and travel plans. It essentially formalizes U.S. policy to support a unified Bosnia and gives the President a clear directive and new tools to punish those who threaten the 1995 peace agreement.
This Act isn't subtle. It mandates that the President regularly compile a list of foreign individuals—and this is key, foreign individuals—who are actively undermining the peace, security, or territorial integrity of Bosnia and Herzegovina. This includes anyone trying to set up "illegal parallel institutions" or engaging in serious corruption, like stealing public money or taking bribes. Once a person is on this list, the President must immediately impose sanctions. This means freezing all their property and assets that are in the U.S. or come under the control of a U.S. person. It also means an immediate ban on entering the U.S., with any existing visas getting revoked on the spot. Think of it as an instant, global financial and travel lockdown for anyone trying to destabilize the region.
Here’s where the bill’s reach gets exceptionally broad and potentially controversial: the sanctions can extend to adult family members of the sanctioned person, unless that family member publicly condemns the bad actions and takes steps to oppose them. Imagine having your entire financial life upended because of your uncle's bad decisions unless you publicly denounce him—that’s a heavy requirement. Furthermore, the bill gives the Treasury Department the power to restrict or ban U.S. banks from dealing with foreign financial institutions that knowingly handle a major transaction for a sanctioned person. This secondary sanction can put a lot of pressure on international banks to cut ties with the targeted individuals, making it harder for them to move money globally. It’s a serious tool designed to isolate the bad actors completely.
To ensure the sanctions don't punish regular citizens, the bill includes crucial exemptions. Sanctions cannot block transactions related to humanitarian aid, food, medicine, or medical devices. This is a necessary guardrail to prevent the policy from harming the population it's meant to protect. On the oversight front, the bill requires the President to review and report back to key Congressional committees within 60 days whenever those committees request a sanctions review of a specific person. This creates a mandatory check on the executive branch's power, ensuring Congress has a direct and timely role in the sanctions process, though this review process itself is set to expire after five years.
Perhaps the most interesting detail for policy watchers is the seven-year sunset clause. The entire Act, and all the new powers and programs it creates, will automatically expire seven years after it becomes law. This means Congress will be forced to revisit the legislation and decide if it's still necessary and effective, preventing it from becoming permanent, unchecked policy. Overall, this bill is a heavy-handed, yet targeted, approach designed to restore order in the Balkans by applying maximum financial pressure on those who benefit from chaos, but it also grants the executive branch significant power to freeze assets and isolate individuals based on a broad set of criteria.