This bill exempts certain private fund investment advisers managing under \$5 billion for qualified or accredited investors from SEC registration while easing biennial reporting requirements for smaller SEC-registered advisers.
Andrew Garbarino
Representative
NY-2
The Tailoring for Main Street’s Investors Act aims to reduce regulatory burdens on certain investment advisers who exclusively manage private funds for high-net-worth investors. This bill exempts advisers managing under \$5 billion in assets from full SEC registration, provided their funds have limited liquidity. Additionally, it eases reporting requirements for smaller advisers managing under \$1 billion by allowing them to file their Form ADV biennially and mandates the creation of a simplified short form for these firms.
The “Tailoring for Main Streets Investors Act” is less about Main Street investors and more about reducing the regulatory load on investment advisers, especially those managing private funds. This bill carves out a significant new exemption from mandatory SEC registration for mid-sized private fund managers and cuts down on the required paperwork for smaller investment firms.
Section 2 of this Act creates a new path for certain investment advisers to skip full registration with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). To qualify, the adviser must only manage private funds and have less than $5 billion in assets under management (AUM) within the U.S. That’s a massive amount of capital to pull out from under the SEC’s full registration umbrella. The catch? These funds can only accept money from "qualified purchasers" or "accredited investors." Think of these as the financial VIPs—people who already have a lot of money and are presumed to be sophisticated enough to handle risk. For the average person saving for retirement, this exemption doesn't affect you directly, but it means a significant chunk of the investment world is operating with less direct oversight. The bill also specifies that these exempt funds can’t offer easy redemption rights, meaning if you’re an accredited investor in one of these funds, don’t expect to pull your money out quickly in a pinch; your capital is locked up for the long haul.
If you’re a smaller investment adviser—one with less than $1 billion in AUM—Section 3 offers a welcome break from compliance headaches. Currently, these firms have to file their official registration document, Form ADV, with the SEC every year. This bill changes that requirement to once every two years. For smaller firms, this isn't just a minor administrative tweak; it’s a tangible reduction in compliance costs and staff time. The SEC is also mandated to create a simplified “short form” version of the ADV within 280 days of the bill becoming law, giving these smaller firms an easier way to meet their biennial reporting requirements.
This legislation presents a classic regulatory trade-off. On one hand, reducing the administrative burden on smaller and mid-sized advisers is a clear benefit, potentially lowering their operating costs and allowing them to focus more on managing money. This could theoretically encourage more small firms to enter the market. On the other hand, the $5 billion exemption is a big deal. While the bill aims to protect the general public by limiting these exempt funds to only wealthy and sophisticated investors, it does reduce the amount of current information the SEC has on a large pool of capital. For investors in these private funds, they gain access to a manager who has lower compliance costs, but they lose some of the protections afforded by full SEC registration and must accept significantly restricted liquidity. The less frequently the SEC has to see the books of these firms (even the smaller ones), the longer it might take to catch potential compliance issues or risks that could spill over into the broader financial system.