PolicyBrief
H.R. 4123
119th CongressJun 25th 2025
Federal Improvement in Technology Procurement Act
IN COMMITTEE

The Federal Improvement in Technology Procurement Act aims to modernize federal technology buying by enhancing workforce training, streamlining purchasing rules, increasing competition for small businesses, and improving oversight.

Eric Burlison
R

Eric Burlison

Representative

MO-7

LEGISLATION

Government Raises Tech Buying Limits to $500K, Mandates AI Training for Federal Buyers

The newly proposed Federal Improvement in Technology Procurement Act (FIT Procurement Act) is essentially a massive software update for how the federal government shops. It tackles the widely acknowledged problem that government procurement moves at the speed of bureaucracy, while technology moves at the speed of light. The goal is to make government buying smarter, faster, and more accessible to modern businesses.

Leveling Up the Government Shopping Cart

For anyone who has ever wrestled with government paperwork, the biggest, most immediate change in this bill is a massive streamlining of small purchases. Right now, agencies can use a simplified, fast-track process for purchases up to $250,000. This bill doubles that limit to $500,000 (Sec. 4). Think of the red tape that avoids. For smaller, routine buys—like office supplies or a handful of software licenses—the limit for "micro-purchases" (which require almost zero paperwork) jumps from $10,000 to a much more useful $25,000 (Sec. 4). This means federal agencies can buy off-the-shelf tech and services much faster, potentially getting better prices and certainly getting what they need sooner. This change also explicitly allows agencies to pay for modern tech services like cloud computing subscriptions and tenancy, clarifying rules that were clearly written before the internet existed (Sec. 4).

Teaching the Old Dogs New Tech Tricks

This bill recognizes that you can’t buy modern tech like AI, cloud computing, and cybersecurity solutions with 1980s contracting expertise. The Act mandates a complete overhaul of training for the federal "acquisition workforce"—the people who sign the checks. Within 18 months, the Federal Acquisition Institute must roll out a specialized training program focused on Information and Communications Technology (ICT) (Sec. 3). This isn’t just a PowerPoint presentation; the training must cover market research, how to buy commercial products, and include hands-on practice with cross-functional teams. Crucially, it must cover key technologies like AI, cloud computing, and cybersecurity (Sec. 3). To ensure this training is funded, the bill increases the amount of money reserved for acquisition workforce training from 5% to 7.5% of a specific fund (Sec. 3).

Opening the Door for the Little Guys

If you run a small tech company, a startup, or any business that hasn't spent decades chasing government contracts, this bill could be a game-changer for competition. The Act requires the government to issue guidance on how agencies must consider a company’s past work, even if it was for commercial clients and not the government (Sec. 5). This is a huge deal. Currently, if you don't have a long history of federal contracts, it’s almost impossible to win new ones, creating a vicious cycle. The new rules aim to fix this by allowing agencies to judge proposals based on demonstrations, testing, or commercial success, instead of just a stack of old government performance reviews (Sec. 5).

Furthermore, the bill directs the Chief Acquisition Officers Council to actively identify and eliminate unnecessary procedural hurdles—the paperwork and qualification rules that disproportionately block small businesses from competing (Sec. 5). To ensure accountability, the Government Accountability Office (GAO) is tasked with completing a major review within 18 months to assess how well small businesses are actually participating in federal procurement, particularly in tech projects, and what the remaining roadblocks are (Sec. 6).

The Catch: No New Money

While the bill mandates several major changes—new training programs, regulatory updates, and extensive reporting—it includes a straightforward Section 8: No additional funding is authorized. This means every federal agency must implement these changes, including the complex new training and reporting requirements, using money they already have (Sec. 8). This is the classic government paradox: a mandate for improvement without the dedicated budget to execute it. Agencies will have to shuffle existing funds to comply, which could slow down implementation or force cuts elsewhere.

Finally, the bill mandates an update to the Federal Acquisition Regulation to tighten up conflict of interest procedures for government buyers, ensuring that the people making these half-million-dollar decisions aren't improperly influenced by personal financial stakes or organizational ties (Sec. 7). This is a necessary step to protect the integrity of the newly streamlined processes.